It turns out that it's problematic to embed ThreadLocalStyleContext within
LayoutContext, because parameterizing the former on TElement (which we do
in the next patch) infects all the traversal stuff with the trait parameters,
which we don't really want.
In general, it probably makes sense to use separate scoped TLS types for
the separate DOM and Flow tree passes, so we can add a different ScopedTLS
type for the Flow pass if we ever need it.
We also reorder the |scope| and |shared| parameters in parallel.rs, because
it aligns more with the order in style/parallel.rs. I did this when I was
adding a TLS parameter to all these functions, which I realized we don't need
for now.
Fix linear gradient's specified form #13892
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
WIP for #13892
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#13892 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14598)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This allows us to get rid of a bunch of lifetimes and simplify a lot of code. It
also lets us get rid of that nasty lifetime transmute, which is awesome.
The situation with thread-local contexts is still suboptimal, but we fix that in
subsequent patches.
The primary idea of this patch is to ditch the rigid enum of Previous/Current
styles, and replace it with a series of indicators for the various types of
work that needs to be performed (expanding snapshots, rematching, recascading,
and damage processing). This loses us a little bit of sanity checking (since
the up-to-date-ness of our style is no longer baked into the type system), but
gives us a lot more flexibility that we'll need going forward (especially when
we separate matching from cascading). We also eliminate get_styling_mode in
favor of a method on the traversal.
This patch does a few other things as ridealongs:
* Temporarily eliminates the handling for transfering ownership of styles to the
frame. We'll need this again at some point, but for now it's causing too much
complexity for a half-implemented feature.
* Ditches TRestyleDamage, which is no longer necessary post-crate-merge, and is
a constant source of compilation failures from either needing to be imported
or being unnecessarily imported (which varies between gecko and servo).
* Expands Snapshots for the traversal root, which was missing before.
* Fixes up the skip_root stuff to avoid visiting the skipped root.
* Unifies parallel traversal and avoids spawning for a single work item.
* Adds an explicit pre_traverse step do any pre-processing and determine whether
we need to traverse at all.
MozReview-Commit-ID: IKhLAkAigXE
Convert column-width to use Either
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
* Converted column-width to use `Either<Length, Auto>`
* Added gecko glue code
* Cleaned up old column-width glue code
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#14350 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests because tests already surround the refactored code.
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14394)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
I realized that I fixed this issue incorrectly when the test failed before. Our design
document specifies that restyle hints must be expanded by the parent before traversing
children, so that we can properly apply LaterSiblings restyle hints. This includes
parents that do not themselves need processing (StylingMode::Traverse).
So we need to preprocess children even in the case where we don't restyle the parent.
On the flip side, we do in fact know whether a child needs processing before enqueuing
it, so we can skip the conservative visit I added before.
MozReview-Commit-ID: AEiRzdsN0h5
Urlmageddon
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Still needs a bunch of code in net to be converted in order to get more
advantage of this for images and stuff, but meanwhile this should help quite a
bit with #13778.
Still wanted to get this in.
r? @SimonSapin
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14246)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The style system never actually does anything with the document. This allows us
to remove a bunch of stubbing on the Gecko side and streamline some things on
the Servo side in future patches.
This commit itself only moves things around and adds an extra parameter to the
`apply_declarations` function to eventually handle #14079 correctly.
Probably needs a more granular API to query fonts, á la nsFontMetrics, but
that's trivial to do once this is landed.
Then we should make the font provider mandatory, and implement the missing stylo
bits.
This patch introduces infrastructure for the rule tree, and constructs it.
We don't use it yet, nor have good heuristics for GC'ing it, but this should not
happen anymore once we store the rule node reference in the node.
I haven't messed up with memory orders because I want to do a try run with it,
then mess with them.
Take down the ApplicableDeclarationsCache, use the rule tree for doing the cascade.
