Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Keith Yeung
c3b17c1201 begin messageport, transferable objects, impl
Accept transfer argument for StructuredCloneData::write

Allow structured clone reads to return a boolean

Add Transferable trait

Add basic skeletons to MessagePort

Implement transfer and transfer-receiving steps on MessagePort

Use transfer and transfer_receive in StructuredClone callbacks

Implement MessageChannel

Freeze the array object for the MessageEvent ports attribute

Implement transfer argument on window.postMessage

Use ReentrantMutex instead for MessagePortInternal

Accept origin as a parameter in dispatch_jsval

Fix BorrowMut crash with pending_port_message

Detach port on closure and check for detached during transfer

Enable webmessaging tests

fix webidl

fix
2019-10-19 14:12:22 +08:00
Jan Andre Ikenmeyer
a1a14459c1
Update MPL license to https (part 3) 2018-11-19 14:47:12 +01:00
Agustin Chiappe Berrini
75eb94afca Unify the task source and task canceller API
I moved away from the `Window` struct all the logic to handle task
sources, into a new struct called `TaskManager`. In a happy world, I'd
be able to just have there two functions, of the types:

```rust
fn task_source<T: TaskSource>(&self, name: TaskSourceName) -> Box<T>
fn task_source_with_canceller<T: TaskSource>(&self, name: TaskSourceName)
  -> (Box<T>, TaskSourceCanceller)
```

And not so much duplicated code. However, because TaskSource can't be a
trait object (because it has generic type parameters), that's not
possible. Instead, I decided to reduce duplicated logic through macros.

For reasons[1], I have to pass both the name of the function with
canceller and the name of the function without, as I'm not able to
concatenate them in the macro itself. I could probably use
`concat_idents` to create both types already defined and reduce the
amount of arguments by one, but that macro is nightly only. At the same
time, not being able to declare macros inside `impl` forces me to pass
`self` as an argument.

All this makes this solution more verbose than it would be ideally. It
does reduce duplication, but it doesn't reduce the size of the file.

[1](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29599)
2018-11-14 06:36:44 -05:00