stylo: support background-size and corner gradients
Forgot to fix this in the midst of all other things fixed in #12945
<s>(not yet tested, need to figure out how to test bg-size with gradients)</s>
r? @bholley
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13157)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
stylo: Don't calculate restyle damage on text nodes
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes (the Servo-side, that is)
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/12957)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Use conditional compilation for stylo properties; output unimplemented logs for all properties
Till now we were only emitting unimplemented property logs for properties which servo implements but stylo doesn't.
This list is getting smaller, and we really should be emitting this for any unexpected property we encounter.
I also made it so that longhands which stylo does not implement will not be compiled in stylo builds; instead of what we currently do,
which is to parse them and then basically ignore the result.
There are still a few exceptions -- we generate stubs for properties that are parts of shorthands because otherwise we'd have to add fiddly conditional compilation to the shorthand code.
r? @bholley
cc @emilio
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13163)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Don't incorrectly clamp values in calc that might not be only lengths.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13159)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Expressions with percentages may be negative or positive at computed value time.
So, we can only clamp lengths at computed value time, which is what the other
browsers do.
Don't use mem::uninitialized() for making calc values
We had code relying on `nsStyleCoord::set()` being leaky (like it was
before we patched up the calc bindings). Added `nsStyleCoord::null()` for
this use case since it's not possible to construct directly anymore.
r? @emilio
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13148)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
We had code relying on `nsStyleCoord::set()` being leaky (like it was before we
patched up the calc bindings). Added `nsStyleCoord::null()` for this use case
since it's not possible to construct directly anymore.
Handle specialized serialization of <position> in basic shapes
Fixes#13083
We temporarily broke basic-shape serialization in #13042 when 4-value positions were implemented, since I didn't want to increase the scope of that PR too much.
This fixes it.
r? @SimonSapin
cc @canaltinova
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13122)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Properly track whether negative values of calc() are allowed
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
r? @SimonSapin
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
In order to clamp them at computed value time.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13121)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Add lots of Arc’s in style, and prepare for using DOMRefCell
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
`DOMRefCell` usage is not there year because of thread-safety questions, but I have this much already that I’d like to land before it bitrots.
r? @emilio
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require new tests because refactor
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13134)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
`Stylist` contains separate hashmaps for important and normal declarations,
but typically a given block only contains declarations of one importance.
Before this commit, there is an optimization where
a `PropertyDeclarationBlock` is only inserted in the corresponding map
if it has a non-zero number of declaration of a given importance.
With CSSOM, `PropertyDeclarationBlock` is gonna have interior mutability:
the importance (priority) of a declaration could change.
This optimization would become incorrect when the block is missing
in a hashmap where it should be.
This commits removes the original optimization, and replaces it with
a slightly weaker one: if a block doesn’t have any declaration
with the importance we’re cascading for, skip selector matching.
a script query.
This will, rather unfortunately, mean that we might repaint two times if we've
deferred a paint, then get an out-of-band reflow. Still seemed better than not
suppressing paints at all.
Fixes#13131
Fix debug assertion introduced in #13108 by me.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#13125 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] These changes do not require tests because https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/13127
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
I'm stupid, and when I did the last moving-the-code-around, I failed miserably
to double-check it in a debug build.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13128)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The dependency count is not at all minor, and this way we avoid looping
through all of them in the common cases, mainly either changing state, or
attributes.
Handle 3- and 4- valued <position>s in style
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
This is first part of fix#12690 and covers just specified style part for now.
r? @Manishearth
---
- [X] These changes fix#12690 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/13042)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
