Accept transfer argument for StructuredCloneData::write
Allow structured clone reads to return a boolean
Add Transferable trait
Add basic skeletons to MessagePort
Implement transfer and transfer-receiving steps on MessagePort
Use transfer and transfer_receive in StructuredClone callbacks
Implement MessageChannel
Freeze the array object for the MessageEvent ports attribute
Implement transfer argument on window.postMessage
Use ReentrantMutex instead for MessagePortInternal
Accept origin as a parameter in dispatch_jsval
Fix BorrowMut crash with pending_port_message
Detach port on closure and check for detached during transfer
Enable webmessaging tests
fix webidl
fix
I moved away from the `Window` struct all the logic to handle task
sources, into a new struct called `TaskManager`. In a happy world, I'd
be able to just have there two functions, of the types:
```rust
fn task_source<T: TaskSource>(&self, name: TaskSourceName) -> Box<T>
fn task_source_with_canceller<T: TaskSource>(&self, name: TaskSourceName)
-> (Box<T>, TaskSourceCanceller)
```
And not so much duplicated code. However, because TaskSource can't be a
trait object (because it has generic type parameters), that's not
possible. Instead, I decided to reduce duplicated logic through macros.
For reasons[1], I have to pass both the name of the function with
canceller and the name of the function without, as I'm not able to
concatenate them in the macro itself. I could probably use
`concat_idents` to create both types already defined and reduce the
amount of arguments by one, but that macro is nightly only. At the same
time, not being able to declare macros inside `impl` forces me to pass
`self` as an argument.
All this makes this solution more verbose than it would be ideally. It
does reduce duplication, but it doesn't reduce the size of the file.
[1](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29599)
Send>
We don't have `window` for `workers`. So, if we use `global.as_window()`
to get the DOMManipulationTaskSource, it will make worker panic.
Instead, we should get the DOMManipulationTaskSource from each own
thread.
Ref: https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/20755#discussion_r193557746
http://www.robohornet.org gives a score of 101.36 on master,
and 102.68 with this PR. The latter is slightly better,
but probably within noise level.
So it looks like this PR does not affect DOM performance.
This is expected since `Box::new` is defined as:
```rust
impl<T> Box<T> {
#[inline(always)]
pub fn new(x: T) -> Box<T> {
box x
}
}
```
With inlining, it should compile to the same as box syntax.
