The history is now recorded per frame, but needs to be exposed in a followup PR.
Also fixes a race condition that occurs loading iframes under heavy CPU load.
This ensures that iframes never do a reflow / layout until they have a valid
window size set from their parent frame.
@jdm This initial version has a few outstanding issues that I wanted to invite input on. Specifically:
1. I had some difficulty finding a home for the `StorageType` enum. Structs defined outside of the `script` module don't seem to be able to use the `#[jstraceable]` annotation and the `net` module (where `StorageTask` lives) doesn't have access to `script`. Per Simon Sapin's suggestion, I worked around this temporarily by creating a `TraceableStorageType` stand-in struct that was traceable and which could be translated into a regular `StorageType` when being sent to the `StorageTask`. Unsure of the best way to resolve this hack. Thoughts?
2. Apart from the `Storage` constructor used in `Window::SessionStorage` and the new `Window::LocalStorage`, there's also a method called `Storage::Constructor`. I'm unclear on what (if anything) will actually invoke this, so I'm not sure which variant of `StorageType` to use here. I've temporarily created an `Unknown` variant of `StorageType` as a placeholder.
3. I discovered that the web platform tests directory's localStorage tests. Many of them now pass despite the configured expectation that they fail. However, several do not pass. Is there a good way for me to add debug logging or otherwise get a sense of which assertion failed / what went wrong?
Thanks for your continued help!
Table layout code has been refactored to push the spacing down to
rowgroups and rows; this will aid the implementation of
`border-collapse` as well.
r? @SimonSapin
`cellspacing` attribute per HTML5 § 14.3.9.
Table layout code has been refactored to push the spacing down to
rowgroups and rows; this will aid the implementation of
`border-collapse` as well.
This commit also fixes two nasty issues in table layout:
* In fixed layout, extra space would not be divided among columns that
had auto width but had nonzero minimum width.
* In automatic layout, extra space would be distributed to constrained
columns as well even if unconstrained columns with percentage equal to
zero were present.
As noted by @bholley. "unwrap" is confusing because we are
both stripping off wrappers *and* getting a native from a
reflector. Changing the "unwrap" usage to "native_from_reflector"
for clarity.
This renames 'unwrap' to 'native_from_reflector' and
'unwrap_jsmanaged' to 'native_from_reflector_jsmanaged'.
This patch enables the use of `arc()` on the canvas.
I couldn't add reftest this time, as it involves some antialiasing issues, and so the reference doesn't match.
Opening this PR to invite feedback.
Of the many `match` statement candidates for conversion to `if let`, several included `if` guards. Since `if let` doesn't support this syntax, I used nested if statements. If this is undesirable, say the word and I can revert those cases to `match`.
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
Reconstructed from #5138 via raw diffing.
r? @SimonSapin
§ 12.3-12.5.
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
`background-size` per CSS-BACKGROUNDS § 3.9.
Nearest neighbor interpolation is used for `crisp-edges`, like Firefox.
A note has been added that we could do better if we wanted to.
Multiple backgrounds are not yet supported.
Rebase of #4368. Fixes#4368.
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
Moved from #4544, because Critic.
Fixes#4544.
`background-size` per CSS-BACKGROUNDS § 3.9.
Nearest neighbor interpolation is used for `crisp-edges`, like Firefox.
A note has been added that we could do better if we wanted to.
Multiple backgrounds are not yet supported.
§ 12.3-12.5.
Only simple alphabetic and numeric counter styles are supported. (This
is most of them though.)
Although this PR adds a sequential pass to layout, I verified that on
pages that contain a reasonable number of ordered lists (Reddit
`/r/rust`), the time spent in generated content resolution is dwarfed by
the time spent in the parallelizable parts of layout. So I don't expect
this to negatively affect our parallelism expect perhaps in pathological
cases.
