This patch provides some of the groundwork for column spans greater than
1. It implements the column-span CSS property (prefixed so as not to be
exposed to content) as well as the corresponding colspan attribute;
although the former is not well-specified outside of CSS multi-column
layout, INTRINSIC refers to it. Although width is distributed to
spanning columns, they do not yet contribute minimum and preferred
widths; this will be implemented in a follow-up.
Additionally, this patch cleans up some miscellaneous formatting issues
and improves the handling of table rowgroups.
Additionally, this patch cleans up some miscellaneous formatting issues
and refactors files in `layout/css/` somewhat to eliminate needless
levels of indirection. It also fixes our handling of presentational
hints that only apply if border is nonzero.
The exact rendering is ill-spec'd. Some things are ugly (especially the
width and height of list style images) but they are infrequently used
and I believe this implementation matches the spec. Numeric lists are
not supported yet, since they will require a separate layout pass.
The implementation is a subclass of `BlockFlow`, on advice from Robert
O'Callahan.
This commit removes the "merge-fragments" pass from inline reflow,
instead merging "on the fly". This ended up being simpler, as well as
more fine grained. Additionally, this patch makes the line breaker no
longer clone every fragment (!)
This functionality will be used in the implementation of
`text-overflow`.
This property is used by approximately 55% of page loads.
To implement the line breaking behavior, the "breaking strategy" has
been cleaned up and abstracted. This should allow us to easily support
other similar properties in the future, such as `text-overflow` and
`word-break`.
This assumes that there are no ligatures that span across multiple
words. Since we have a per-word shape cache, this is a safe assumption
as of now. I have left comments to ensure that, if and when this is
revisted, we make sure to handle it properly.
I had to use a somewhat unconventional method of computing text
indentation (propagating from blocks down to inlines) because of the way
containing blocks are handled in Servo.
(As a side note, neither Gecko nor WebKit correctly handles percentages
in `text-align`, at least incrementally -- i.e. when the percentages are
relative to the viewport and the viewport is resized.)
The ligature disabling code has been manually verified, but I was unable
to reftest it. (The only way I could think of would be to create an
Ahem-like font with a ligature table, but that would be an awful lot of
work.)
Near as I can tell, the method used to apply the spacing (manually
inserting extra advance post-shaping) matches Gecko.
By "idempotent" I mean that later passes do not stomp on data from
earlier passes, so that we can run the passes individually for
incremental reflow. The main change here was to stop overwriting the
"minimum inline-size" field of each column with the column's computed
inline-size.
r? @mbrubeck
`invert` is not yet supported.
Objects that get layers will not yet display outlines properly. This is
because our overflow calculation doesn't take styles into account and
because layers are always anchored to the top left of the border box.
Since fixing this is work that is not related to outline *per se* I'm
leaving that to a followup and making a note in the code.
By "idempotent" I mean that later passes do not stomp on data from
earlier passes, so that we can run the passes individually for
incremental reflow. The main change here was to stop overwriting the
"minimum inline-size" field of each column with the column's computed
inline-size.
The Unicode awareness of `text-transform` is implemented as well as
possible given the Rust standard library's Unicode support. In
particular, the notion of an alphabetic character is used instead of a
letter.
Gecko has a subclass of text run to handle text transforms, but I
implemented this in a simpler way.
r? @SimonSapin
The Unicode awareness of `text-transform` is implemented as well as
possible given the Rust standard library's Unicode support. In
particular, the notion of an alphabetic character is used instead of a
letter.
Gecko has a subclass of text run to handle text transforms, but I
implemented this in a simpler way.
When inserting a node that was already dirtied, the dirtying logic
would short circuit: "This node is already dirty? Great! Then its
parents must be HAS_DIRTY_DESCENDANTS, too! Let's skip that step."
This isn't appropriate when nodes move around the tree. In that case,
the node may be marked HAS_CHANGED, but ancestors may not yet have
the HAS_DIRTY_DESCENDANTS flag set.
This patch adds a `content_and_heritage_changed` hook in the document,
to deal with these cases appropriately.
This makes these parameters self-documenting.
This patch does not attempt to push those enums into the data
structures that feed calls to this function.
Fixes#4158.
This makes these parameters self-documenting.
This patch does not attempt to push those enums into the data
structures that feed calls to this function.
Fixes#4158.
This adds the infrastructure necessary to support stacking contexts that
are not containing blocks for absolutely-positioned elements. Our
infrastructure did not support that before. This minor revamp actually
ended up simplifying the logic around display list building and
stacking-relative position computation for absolutely-positioned flows,
which was nice.
When inserting a node that was already dirtied, the dirtying logic
would short circuit: "This node is already dirty? Great! Then its
parents must be HAS_DIRTY_DESCENDANTS, too! Let's skip that step."
This isn't appropriate when nodes move around the tree. In that case,
the node may be marked HAS_CHANGED, but ancestors may not yet have
the HAS_DIRTY_DESCENDANTS flag set.
This patch adds a `content_and_heritage_changed` hook in the document,
to deal with these cases appropriately.
This patch is a first stab at implementing border-radius. It looks fine as long as
the border isn't an ellipse (that might not even parse yet), and the border-widths
around a border-radius are the same.
Here's a cool screenshot!
r? @pcwalton @SimonSapin
This implements the scheme described here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.servo/sZVPSfPVfkg
This commit changes Servo to generate one display list per stacking
context instead of one display list per layer. This is purely a
refactoring; there are no functional changes. Performance is essentially
the same as before. However, there should be numerous future benefits
that this is intended to allow for:
* It makes the code simpler to understand because the "new layer needed"
vs. "no new layer needed" code paths are more consolidated.
* It makes it easy to support CSS properties that did not fit into our
previous flat display list model (without unconditionally layerizing
them):
o `opacity` should be easy to support because the stacking context
provides the higher-level grouping of display items to which opacity
is to be applied.
o `transform` can be easily supported because the stacking context
provides a place to stash the transformation matrix. This has the side
benefit of nicely separating the transformation matrix from the
clipping regions.
* The `flatten` logic is now O(1) instead of O(n) and now only needs to
be invoked for pseudo-stacking contexts (right now: just floats),
instead of for every stacking context.
* Layers are now a proper tree instead of a flat list as far as layout
is concerned, bringing us closer to a production-quality
compositing/layers framework.
* This commit opens the door to incremental display list construction at
the level of stacking contexts.
Future performance improvements could come from optimizing allocation of
display list items, and, of course, incremental display list
construction.
r? @glennw
f? @mrobinson @cgaebel
