style: Add an iterator for transition properties
This simplifies the code a bit and also will allow us to more easily
make improvements to servo's animation implementation in the future.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests because they should not change behavior.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Add VCINSTALLDIR to the 'do not run within vcvarsall' check
Servo is able to run with VSINSTALLDIR set, but not VCINSTALLDIR, since cc-rs takes it to mean vcvarsall has been called.
As far as I can tell servo is able to build with a custom VS install without needing help finding it (aside from perhaps VSINSTALLDIR), since many tools use a non-env var method of finding VS.
r? @jdm
Report error when vcvarsall fails
In trying to get my Windows cross build working on my desktop, I ended up spending a lot of time trying to replicate a failure within servo's build system that ultimately turned out to be vcvarsall silently failing (I was missing a trailing slash in my `VSINSTALLDIR` env var, which vcvarsall does not handle well at all)
We should report an error when this happens.
r? @jdm
This patch computes the author-specified properties during the CSS cascade, and
removes the complex rule-tree-based implementation that tries to do the cascade
again.
This changes behavior in two ways, one of them which is not observable to
content, I believe:
* revert now re-enables the native styling. This was brought up in
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4777 and I think it is a bug-fix.
This is observable to content, and I'm adding a test for it.
* We don't look at inherited styles from our ancestors when `inherit` is
specified in a non-author stylesheet. This was introduced for bug 452969 but
we don't seem to inherit background anymore for file controls or such. It
seems back then file controls used to have a text-field.
I audited forms.css and ua.css and we don't explicitly inherit
padding / border / background-color into any nested form control.
We keep the distinction between border/background and padding, because the later
has some callers. I think we should try to align with Chromium in the long run
and remove the padding bit.
We need to give an appearance to the range-thumb and such so that we can assert
that we don't call HasAuthorSpecifiedRules on non-themed stuff. I used a new
internal value for that.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D67722