Add memory reporter integration for the fragment and box trees that are
persisted in the layout thread.
Testing: Looked at the numbers for https://servo.org and
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/. The former was very small, but the latter
was 700mb.
---------
Signed-off-by: Josh Matthews <josh@joshmatthews.net>
When laying out tables, store the boxes of non-anonymous table parts in
their respective DOM objects. This is going to be important for
incremental layout, but also for mapping from the DOM to the box tree
(and eventually the fragment tree).
For now, anonymous table parts are still lost to time and space, but
in a followup change we hope to store them somewhere.
Testing: This has no visible change to web rendering, so is covered by
existing
WPT.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
There were two kinds of layout tracing controlled by the same debugging
option:
- modern layout: Functionality that dumped a JSON serialization of the
layout tree before and after layout.
- legacy layout: A scope based tracing that reported the process of
layout in a structured way.
I don't think anyone working on layout is using either of these two
features. For modern layout requiring data structure to implement
`serde` serialization is incredibly inconvenient and also generates a
lot of extra code.
We also have a more modern tracing functionality based on perfetto that
we have started to use for layout and IMO it's actually being used and
more robust.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
