Add -moz-inert and -moz-script-level to the set of internal properties
that aren't included in "all".
-moz-inert may need to be uncacheable in the future if we make it not
change the pointer-events computed value. Left a comment to that effect.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D87115
-moz-inert CSS property reflects inert subtrees concept and can be used to implement HTML:dialog element and HTML:inert attribute
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D81701
This avoids arbitrary precision loss when computing REM units and so on,
which is particularly important if we ever change the base of our app
units (but useful regardless).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D79928
This never worked, but it's more visible with the new form controls which have
more padding.
Make the anonymous div and co a pseudo-element, so that they inherit from the
<input> properly in all cases. This works for non-number inputs because the
editor root is a direct child of the <input>, but it doesn't for number inputs
because there's a flex wrapper in between.
This way overflow-clip-box: inherit does what we want. Reset the padding in the
inline direction, as the padding for <input type=number> applies to the arrow
boxes as well, and thus we'd double-apply it.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D65271
I think this should work for the animation throttling stuff.
Opacity works on the element tree, so I think this is sound.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D64441
This matches the new servo layout engine too, and thus removes some #[cfg]
gunk. Just use `flow` since it doesn't simplify the layout code as much.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D45973
I see atom dropping code generated in release builds for stuff like dropping the
"class" atom here:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/4df8821c1b824db5f40f381f48432f219d99ae36/servo/components/style/gecko/wrapper.rs#592
That is silly, and I hope making Atom be able to be used in const context will
help the compiler see that yeah, we're not doing anything interesting and the
atom shouldn't get dropped.
It also allows us to get rid of a few lazy_static!s, so we should do it anyway.
In order to accomplish this, compute the offset into gGkAtoms manually instead
of going through the static_atoms() array and then back to the byte offset.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D55039
D29542 fixed the bogus checks that was making nested pseudo-elements match
author rules. This adds tests and ends up being just a cleanup, though as it
turns out we it also fixes an issue with ::slotted() matched from
Element.matches.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27529
We were spuriously reframing the <shadow> because it initially shared style with
the <br>, which ended up being display: none, while the <shadow> should've been
display: contents from the beginning.
lookup_by_rules seems pretty prone to obscure bugs, and also it's pretty
complex... Probably we should try to get rid of it, I'm unconvinced that it's
worth it.
Even with that, in a normal restyle the <details> wouldn't have ended up with a
style. It of course never had it before the reframe because the <shadow> was
display: none, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't have gotten one, since we
detected we needed to go through kids in:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/6eea08365e7386a2b81c044e7cc8a3daa51d8754/servo/components/style/matching.rs#500
That code did happen, but since it's an animation-only restyle, we don't look at
unstyled stuff.
That looks somewhat fishy, but I guess for now it's fine as long as display
isn't animatable.
Bug: 1469076
Reviewed-by: heycam
MozReview-Commit-ID: B6NMSTNOKgK
