replace DocumentSource::NotFromParser with DocumentSource::FromParser
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
per https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/4297/files#r158729975
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19647)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
implement valid DatetimeLocal input
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
implement valid Date time Local input
part of #19172
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#19587 fix #19603(github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19602)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Correctly place images with background-position: center
Add a regression ref test.
See also #19680.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19699)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Remove TNode::set_can_be_fragmented and TNode::can_be_fragmented.
Replace them instead by a computed value flag, the same way as the
IS_IN_DISPLAY_NONE_SUBTREE flag works.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18893)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Unify background placement code
Merges the implementations for background-image placement
from gradients and images. Add missing parts and fix bugs.
Now supported are the CSS properties:
* background-attachment (except for local value, see #19650)
* background-clip
* background-origin
* background-position-x/y
* background-repeat
* background-size
It should be noted that backgrounds are not clipped to
rounded border corners.
(This was done before but worked only in simple cases)
See: #19649
This solves the following issues:
closes#19626closes#16657closes#19482 (examples from http://lea.verou.me/css3patterns/ are rendered perfectly but the round border is completely ignored now)
closes#19577
- `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
I enabled a few tests with the first commit but I have written about a dozen manual tests I will try to turn into ref tests either before or after this patch lands.
@bors-servo try
The relationship between the different inputs is visualized in this flowchart:
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19651)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Merges the implementations for background-image placement
from gradients and images. Add missing parts and fix bugs.
Now supported are the CSS properties:
* background-attachment (except for local value)
* background-clip
* background-origin
* background-position-x/y
* background-repeat
* background-size
It should be noted that backgrounds are not clipped to
rounded border corners.
implement valid week string
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
implement valid week string
part of #19172
r? @KiChjang
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19559)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Use background-size, background-position properties to render
CSS gradients.
Some cleanup in display_list_builder.rs related to gradient
calculations.
Adds two wpt tests for tiled gradients.
Note: For now even gradients with background-repeat: no-repeat
are repeated. Sometimes the gradient is not repeated everywhere.
Enable vars-background-shorthand-001.html CSS test.
Handle cases where selection API doesn't apply
The selection API only applies to certain <input> types:
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#do-not-apply
This commit ensures that we handle that correctly.
Some notes:
1. TextControl::set_dom_selection_direction now calls
set_selection_range(), which means that setting selectionDirection will
now fire a selection event, as it should per the spec.
2. There is a test for the firing of the select event in
tests/wpt/web-platform-tests/html/semantics/forms/textfieldselection/select-event.html,
however the test did not run due to this syntax error:
(pid:26017) "ERROR:script::dom::bindings::error: Error at http://web-platform.test:8000/html/semantics/forms/textfieldselection/select-event.html:50:11 missing = in const declaration"
This happens due to the us of the "for (const foo of ...)" construct.
Per https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/for...of
this should actually work, so it's somewhat unsatisfying to have to
change the test.
3. I removed tests/wpt/web-platform-tests/html/semantics/forms/textfieldselection/selection-not-application-textarea.html
because it doesn't seem to add any extra value - the selection API
always applies to textarea elements, and the API is tested elsewhere.
4. If an `<input>`'s type is unset, it defaults to a text, and the
selection API applies. Also, if an `<input>`'s type is set to an
invalid value, it defaults to a text too. This second case doesn't
currently work, and I'll need to do more restructuring of the code in
a future commit. See discussion with nox in IRC:
https://mozilla.logbot.info/servo/20171201#c13946454-c13946594
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19461)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The selection API only applies to certain <input> types:
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#do-not-apply
This commit ensures that we handle that correctly.
Some notes:
1. TextControl::set_dom_selection_direction now calls
set_selection_range(), which means that setting selectionDirection will
now fire a selection event, as it should per the spec.
2. There is a test for the firing of the select event in
tests/wpt/web-platform-tests/html/semantics/forms/textfieldselection/select-event.html,
however the test did not run due to this syntax error:
(pid:26017) "ERROR:script::dom::bindings::error: Error at http://web-platform.test:8000/html/semantics/forms/textfieldselection/select-event.html:50:11 missing = in const declaration"
This happens due to the us of the "for (const foo of ...)" construct.
Per https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/for...of
this should actually work, so it's somewhat unsatisfying to have to
change the test.
4. If an <input>'s type is unset, it defaults to a text, and the
selection API applies. Also, if an <input>'s type is set to an
invalid value, it defaults to a text too. I've expanded the tests
to account for this second case.
Expand InputType to cover all possible types
This came out of a conversation with nox in IRC:
https://mozilla.logbot.info/servo/20171201#c13946454-c13946594
The code I was working on which motivated this change is here:
https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/19461
Previously, InputType::Text was used to represent several different
values of the type attribute on an input element.
If an input element doesn't have a type attribute, or its type attribute
doesn't contain a recognised value, then the input's type defaults to
"text".
Before this change, there were a number of checks in the code which
directly looked at the type attribute. If those checks matched against
the value "text", then they were potentially buggy, since an input with
type=invalid should also behave like an input with type=text.
Rather than have every conditional which cares about the input type also
have to deal with invalid input types, we can convert the type attribute
to an InputType enum once, and then match against the enum.
A secondary benefit is that the compiler can tell us whether we've
missed branches in a match expression. While working on this I
discovered that the HTMLInputElement::value_mode() method misses a case
for inputs with type=hidden (this resulted in a failing WPT test
passing).
I've also implemented the Default trait for InputType, so we now only
have one place in the code which knows that InputType::Text is the
default, where previously there were several.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19471)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This came out of a conversation with nox in IRC:
https://mozilla.logbot.info/servo/20171201#c13946454-c13946594
The code I was working on which motivated this change is here:
https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/19461
Previously, InputType::Text was used to represent several different
values of the type attribute on an input element.
If an input element doesn't have a type attribute, or its type attribute
doesn't contain a recognised value, then the input's type defaults to
"text".
Before this change, there were a number of checks in the code which
directly looked at the type attribute. If those checks matched against
the value "text", then they were potentially buggy, since an input with
type=invalid should also behave like an input with type=text.
Rather than have every conditional which cares about the input type also
have to deal with invalid input types, we can convert the type attribute
to an InputType enum once, and then match against the enum.
A secondary benefit is that the compiler can tell us whether we've
missed branches in a match expression. While working on this I
discovered that the HTMLInputElement::value_mode() method misses a case
for inputs with type=hidden (this resulted in a failing WPT test
passing).
I've also implemented the Default trait for InputType, so we now only
have one place in the code which knows that InputType::Text is the
default, where previously there were several.
Handle arraybuffer responseType in XHR
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Handle arraybuffer responseType in XHR
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19352)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
I had to change the test a little bit to avoid some failures due to
color and text both having a sanitizedValue which was making the test
use the first assertion instead of the second one in some cases.
The sanitize_value implementation is pretty simple, we iterate over the
content and checks that the content is 7 characters long, that the first
character is a `#` and then that all the following characters are
hexadecimal. If all those requirements are met, we lowercase the
content, otherwise we put `#000000` in it.
Continue http cache work
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Work in progress, and not quite worth a review yet. (Continuation of https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/4117)
TODO
- [ ] cache metadata (find some subset of`net_traits::Metadata` that can be shared across threads, it seems the problem is mainly stuff inside `hyper::header` in the `headers` field)
- [ ] determine which other fields of a `Response` need to be cached, so a full and valid one can be returned upon a cache hit.
- [ ] determine how to best share the cache across fetch threads (inside HttpState like I tried now?)
- [ ] Spend more time reading the spec and make sure the cache follows it where it matters.
- [ ] Make the current wpt tests pass.
- [ ] More...
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix#12972 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18676)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Update expected results for hash-name-reference.html.
These are stable expected results, and we missed them because the test is marked as intermittent in #16179.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19270)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Implement EventTarget constructor
Resolves#19283
Do "Wrap" functions only created for elements that aren't marked Abstract in .webidl file?
How can I see code that was generated from webidls?
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#19283 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because they are covered by webplatform tests
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19288)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The API for text control selection is the same for both <input> and
<textarea>:
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/form-control-infrastructure.html#textFieldSelection
Before this change, they had similar but not identical implementations
with duplicate code. Now there is a common TextControl trait which
contains the implementation used by both. As a result, some previously
failing tests now pass.
Move assertions about the initial value of selection{Start,End} to their
own tests. This ensures that when one of these assertions fails, it
doesn't prevent other tests from being defined. Thus we have a clearer
view of which tests are passing or failing, since all tests get defined
regardless of which assertions fail.
