Fix#7268 - getComputedStyle should take `Element`, not `HTMLElement`
This is my first patch, I hope I'm doing it right.
About the test, do you think this is enough and reliable?
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7288)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
layout: Centralize the logic that determines whether fragments get layers in the fragment.
…so that it can be activated when we're forcing
the creation of extra layers due to positioned descendants that
themselves have layers.
The newly failing tests were tests that accidentally passed due to
incorrect stacking order.
Closes#7281.
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7291)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
layout: Make `position: relative` with non-auto `z-index` create a stacking context.
Improves imgur.com and Fast Company articles.
This change made `min-height-106.htm.ini` fail because the thing it was testing
for never worked: we were relying on the incorrect stacking order of `position:
relative` to get the green square to show up.
r? @glennw
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7277)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
layers in the fragment, so that it can be activated when we're forcing
the creation of extra layers due to positioned descendants that
themselves have layers.
The newly failing tests were tests that accidentally passed due to
incorrect stacking order.
Closes#7281.
* Don't display unselected `<option>` elements inside `<select>`
dropdowns.
* Use CSS triangles to give `<select>` dropdowns a down arrow in order
to make them look as intended.
* Use borders instead of `( )` and `[ ]` for radio buttons and check
boxes, respectively.
Improves facebook.com and IMDB.
Generates `SupportedPropertyNames` on DOM structs that should implement
it. Most of them are unimplemented now (which can be implemented in
later PRs), with the exception of `HTMLCollection`. Also added a couple
relevant WPT tests.
Closes#6390Closes#2215
Avoid a panic when handling collapsing borders (fixes#7144)
There is no need to compute next_collapsed_borders_in_block_direction for all kind of flows when it's used only in the table row case. That also avoids a panic when the next child is a table colgroup (this should not happen when iterating over a table row).
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7243)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
There is no need to compute next_collapsed_borders_in_block_direction for all
kind of flows when it's used only in the table row case. That also avoids a panic
when the next child is a table colgroup (this should not happen when iterating
over a table row).
into account only once.
There were two bugs here: (1) relative position applied to
scanned/unscanned text fragments independently of the container element
that applied that relative position, causing double-counting; (2)
relative position applied to inline block fragments independently of the
wrapped block itself, causing double-counting.
This commit also removes the `cascade_anonymous` function and the
related `Fragment` constructor. They were unused, and their
functionality has been replaced by the `modify_style_for_*` series of
functions.
Closes#7067.
Implementing document.hasFocus method, needs tests. #6475
I'm not sure if I have to implement some test for a new document method. As I remember there were tests for document methods, is it changed now? Where should I add tests?
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6757)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
layout: Rewrite whitespace stripping.
This patch makes Servo unconditionally strip whitespace before text run
scanning (assuming that the `white-space` property allows it). Whitespace
stripping during reflow is now only used for handling whitespace at the ends of
lines; reflow now never attempts to handle ignorable whitespace.
Many CSS tests pass now. There are some new failures, however.
The following reference tests now fail due to a pre-existing bug whereby
whitespace is used to calculate the position of inline hypothetical boxes for
elements with `display: inline; position: absolute`:
* `absolute-replaced-height-036.htm`
* `vertical-align-sub-001.htm`
* `vertical-align-super-001.htm`
The following reference tests fail due to a pre-existing bug whereby we don't
handle `font-size: 0` properly in inline reflow:
* `font-size-zero-1.htm`
* `font-size-zero-2.htm`
The following reference test fails due to the fact that it relied on our
incorrect insertion of whitespace to make room for the black background:
* `inline-formatting-context-007.htm`
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7024)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
