Fix linear gradient's specified form #13892
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
WIP for #13892
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#13892 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14598)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Stylo: Basic support for grid-{row,column}-{start,end}
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build-geckolib` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14000)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This allows us to get rid of a bunch of lifetimes and simplify a lot of code. It
also lets us get rid of that nasty lifetime transmute, which is awesome.
The situation with thread-local contexts is still suboptimal, but we fix that in
subsequent patches.
Update atoms when build geckolib with gecko
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
This would automatically update the generated atom-related files in-tree before calling cargo to build geckolib. With this change, `./mach build-gecko --with-gecko` should be now the easiest way to update all in-tree bindings.
This isn't really a build-time generating, because it isn't invoked from the build script, but from mach. It isn't done the other way because
1. it doesn't seem to be a common practice for build script to write anything to the src directory
2. real build-time generated atom data wouldn't need to include atoms for multiple platforms, but we still want it so that we can build geckolib independently
cc @heycam
r? @emilio
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14609)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Implement background-position-x/y
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
This is a WIP PR. Just HorizontalPosition / VerticalPosition implementations are complete. I would like to get early feedbacks about this architecture. Here's some architectural topics to consider:
- I created `HorizontalPosition` and `VerticalPosition` structs for this and used them in `Position` as well. We have decided to split `Keyword` enum, but we need them as unified for `PositionComponent` enum. So I didn't split but I can split it if we prefer to change PositionComponent as well.
- If we prefer Keyword enum like this, we can create a SubPosition(or something like this) instead of HorizontalPosition/VerticalPosition enums since only difference is 2 lines in `parse` functions. We can create a `parse_horizontal` and `parse_vertical` instead and a lot of code duplication can be cleared.
- I couldn't find a good way to use HorizontalPosition/VerticalPosition's parse functions in `Position`'s parse function. It is a bit more complicated. I'm open to suggestions :)
- I don't know much about logical keywords so do I need to do something different? I placed some comments where logical keywords are processing.
Any advice about these?
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#14458 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14509)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
stylo: regenerate bindings
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
This corresponds to https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=stylo&revision=10ac81fb6185037648c6694889aa030d28a5e8a5.
There's probably no meaningful change here, but there's a lot of churn since I just changed locally to using clang-3.9. r? @Manishearth
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14580)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Reuse box-shadow code for drop-shadow filter
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Followup for #14218. Extracted the `Shadow` struct and methods into `values::*`, and make `box-shadow` and `drop-shadow` share the new `Shadow` type. The `ToCss` trait is not reused because they behave different in the two properties.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#14219 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14359)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Add asserts to make failure clearer
Gecko currently doesn't pass absolute path for `MOZ_DIST`, which leads to obscure panic when running the build script. This patch adds some assertions so that failures around this would be clearer.
r? @emilio
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14563)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
I noticed that our current behavior in ContentRangeInserted is incorrect. Unlike
ContentInserted (where this code lived originally), ContentRangeInserted takes a
start and end element. I'm not sure if we ever take that path for new content that
needs style, but it seemed sketchy. And generally, it seems nice to just always
style new content the same way (though we still need to style NAC by the subtree
root, since it hasn't been attached to the parent yet).
For situations where there is indeed only one unstyled child, the traversal
overhead should be neglible, since we special-case the single-element in
parallel.rs to avoid calling into rayon.
Being more explicit about what we want here also makes us more robust against
the other handful of callpaths that can take us into
nsCSSFrameConstructor::{ContentRangeInserted,ContentAppended}. Currently we
can call StyleNewSubtree on an already-styled element via RecreateFramesForContent,
which triggers an assertion in the servo traversal.
MozReview-Commit-ID: DqCGh90deHH
Sometimes Gecko eagerly styles things without processing pending restyles first. In
general we'd like to avoid this, but there can be good reasons (for example, needing
to construct a frame for some small piece of newly-added content in order to do something
specific with that frame, but not wanting to flush all of layout). Just handle it.
MozReview-Commit-ID: EjXs0M4855Q
