http://www.robohornet.org gives a score of 101.36 on master,
and 102.68 with this PR. The latter is slightly better,
but probably within noise level.
So it looks like this PR does not affect DOM performance.
This is expected since `Box::new` is defined as:
```rust
impl<T> Box<T> {
#[inline(always)]
pub fn new(x: T) -> Box<T> {
box x
}
}
```
With inlining, it should compile to the same as box syntax.
In a later PR, DomRoot<T> will become a type alias of Root<Dom<T>>,
where Root<T> will be able to handle all the things that need to be
rooted that have a stable traceable address that doesn't move for the
whole lifetime of the root. Stay tuned.
I don't want to do such a gratuitous rename, but with all the other types
now having "Dom" as part of their name, and especially with "DomOnceCell",
I feel like the other cell type that we already have should also follow
the convention. That argument loses weight though when we realise there
is still DOMString and other things.
This should make it somewhat easier to experiment with alternative
representations in the future. To reduce churn, this commit leaves the String
field public, though.
Also, this will allow us to use the default String type to represent the IDL
USVString type, which explicitly forbids unpaired surrogates, ans as such is
a better match to the Rust String type.
Extracted this out of #5649
This commit was created with the following commands:
```
find . -iname "*.webidl" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' 's/http:\(.*\)whatwg.org/https:\1whatwg.org/g'
```
```
find . -iname "*.rs" -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' 's/http:\(.*\)whatwg.org/https:\1whatwg.org/g'
```
This used to conflict with the util crate from the standard library, which
has long since been removed.
The import in layout has not been changed because of a conflict with the
util mod there.
Notes:
* This adds `#![allow(missing_copy_implementations)]` to components/*/lib.rs. I'm not sure how to approach the missing Copy warnings (are there things for which Copy should NOT be implemented, and how can I tell?) so I stuck this in to make life easier when looking through the warnings. I can easily remove this if necessary.
* This leaves the following type of warnings, which I couldn't figure out how to approach (I'll investigate it later if no one else wants to).
```
css/matching.rs:72:23: 72:35 warning: use of deprecated item: Use overloaded core::cmp::PartialEq, #[warn(deprecated)] on by default
css/matching.rs:72 this_as_query.equiv(other)
^~~~~~~~~~~~
css/matching.rs:95:10: 95:49 warning: use of deprecated item: Use overloaded core::cmp::PartialEq, #[warn(deprecated)] on by default
css/matching.rs:95 impl<'a> Equiv<ApplicableDeclarationsCacheEntry> for ApplicableDeclarationsCacheQuery<'a> {
```
