Consistently use the name 'pipeline_id' to refer to a function that
returns an (optional) PipelineId.
This was prompted by discovering both fn pipeline and fn pipeline_id
doing the same job in htmliframeelement.rs.
Note that there is fn pipeline in components/compositing/compositor.rs,
but that actually returns an Option<&CompositionPipeline>, not any kind
of PipelineId.
Fix some build warnings.
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes do not require tests because refactoring
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/11538)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Changes include:
- Add BlobImpl to Blob, and related caching mechanism
- Expose ResourceThreads to document_loader, workerglobalscope, worker, and global
- Fix encode_multipart_form_data
- Other small fixes to accommodate the above changes
This enables sharing data with the parent runtime, decreasing memory usage and startup time. Also contains an update to current rust-mozjs, because that's required for this to work.
Changes include:
- Introduce an IpcSend trait to abstract over a collection of IpcSenders
- Implement ResourceThreads collection to abstract the resource-related
sub threads across the component
- Rename original ResourceThread and ControlMsg into an unifed CoreResource__
to accommodate above changes and avoid confusions
Add timeline markers for HTTP requests, JS evaluation, and HTML parsing.
Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data:
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors (didn't try to compile past a rustc upgrade on airplane wifi)
- [X] `./mach test-tidy --faster` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#11218 (github issue number if applicable).
Either:
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because we don't have testing infrastructure for profiling.
Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/11239)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
