I see atom dropping code generated in release builds for stuff like dropping the
"class" atom here:
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/4df8821c1b824db5f40f381f48432f219d99ae36/servo/components/style/gecko/wrapper.rs#592
That is silly, and I hope making Atom be able to be used in const context will
help the compiler see that yeah, we're not doing anything interesting and the
atom shouldn't get dropped.
It also allows us to get rid of a few lazy_static!s, so we should do it anyway.
In order to accomplish this, compute the offset into gGkAtoms manually instead
of going through the static_atoms() array and then back to the byte offset.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D55039
Some of the stuff, in particular inside GeckoBindings stuff should be
refactored to be less ugly and duplicate a bit less code, but the rest of the
code should be landable as is.
Some invalidation changes are already needed because we weren't matching with
the right shadow host during invalidation (which made existing ::part() tests
fail).
Pending invalidation work:
* Making exportparts work right on the snapshots.
* Invalidating parts from descendant hosts.
They're not very hard but I need to think how to best implement it:
* Maybe get rid of ShadowRoot::mParts and just walk DOM descendants in the
Shadow DOM.
* Maybe implement a ElementHasExportPartsAttr much like HasPartAttr and use
that to keep the list of elements.
* Maybe invalidate :host and ::part() together in here[1]
* Maybe something else.
Opinions?
[1]: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/131338e5017bc0283d86fb73844407b9a2155c98/servo/components/style/invalidation/element/invalidator.rs#561
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53730
Now
* nsPresContext::mVisibleArea is excluding the toolbar max height so that
ICB is now static regardless of the dynamic toolbar transition
* nsPresContext::mSizeForViewportUnits is introduced to resolve viewport units
which is including the toolbar max height
That means that with the dynamic toolbar max height;
mVisibleArea < mSizeForViewportUnits
See https://github.com/bokand/URLBarSizing for more detail backgrounds of this
change.
Depends on D50417
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D50418
And do a full restyle only when the state goes from visited to unvisited or vice
versa. That is, use regular invalidation for addition or removals of href
attributes, for example.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D50821
This is effectively superseded by the hover / any-hover media queries, which
actually are standard, and is also causing trouble in the wild.
Not even the browser fronted uses it, so we should be able to just remove it
everywhere at once.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D49506
1. Add `generics::motion::OffsetPath`, and use specified `Angle` and
computed `Angle` to define specified `OffsetPath` and computed `OffsetPath`.
2. Add `ray` function into `OffsetPath`.
We also tweak the degree from 150deg to 135deg in wpt (e.g.
offset-path-ray-001.html and others) to avoid floating point precision issues.
For example:
```
// offset-path: ray(150deg ...);
// offset-distance: 20px;
matrix:
{
{0.500000 0.866025 0.000000 0.000000},
{-0.866025 0.500000 0.000000 0.000000},
{0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000},
{10.000000 17.320509 0.000000 1.000000}
}
// rotate(60deg) translate(20px)
matrix:
{
{0.500000 0.866025 0.000000 0.000000},
{-0.866025 0.500000 0.000000 0.000000},
{0.000000 0.000000 1.000000 0.000000},
{10.000000 17.320507 0.000000 1.000000}
}
```
Their translate parts, 17.320509 vs 17.320507, are almost the same (only
tiny difference), which may cause the reftest failed.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D42721
Stylo's Gecko wrapper duplicated some logic from the C++ side so
that the Rust compiler would be able to optimize better. Now that
we have xLTO, this kind of manual inlining should not be neccessary
anymore.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D43765
It's much nicer.
One nice thing about this is that the new code is subject to the existing
threadedness checking, which identified that several of these should be atomic
because they're accessed off the main thread.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D40792
And move the useful bits of it somewhere else (ServoStyleConstInlines.h for the
inline function definitions, and nsFrame.cpp for the static assertions).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D36120
This doesn't change the way C++ code uses static prefs. But it does slightly
change how Rust code uses static prefs, specifically the name generated by
bindgen is slightly different.
The commit also improves some comments.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D35764
This patch invalidates the style for `::selection`, which will restore the
behavior before the regression.
However, it's still not quite correct, because repaint is not triggered. Given
that `::selection` requires some major change to implement
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2474, we can address this problem
later.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D35305
I want to enable in Nightly to evaluate (in the medium term) shipping it without
the part forwarding, once the cascade order and importance issues are fixed, and
that we pass all the tests that don't involve forwarding.
That is, I want to monitor whether having ::part() causes compat issues or not.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32649
This should make all the pieces come together.
Note that we don't need to look at the snapshot for ::part() for now (other than
when selector-matching normally) because I decided to just restyle the element
for now when the part attribute changes.
::part() can't affect descendants anyway (as long as we don't do the forwarding
stuff), and eager pseudo-elements are handled during the normal element restyle,
so it seems to me that adding all the complexity that we have for classes to
part may not be worth it at least yet.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32648
I still haven't implemented each_part(), so this will do nothing yet.
The cascade order stuff is fishy, I know, and I'll fix in a followup if it's
fine with you. I moved the sorting of the rules to rule_collector, since it
seemed to me it was better that way that duplicating the code, and those
SelectorMap functions only have a single caller anyway.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32647
Still does nothing, since we still do not collect part rules, but this is all
the plumbing that should allow us to invalidate parts when attributes or state
change on their ancestors.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32642
It looks like bug 1547939 will stick, given how fast the other regressions came
in for bug 1337655.
We haven't seen any regression from this, and it seems unlikely that we'd want
this code back.
This blocks further improvements to the style system. Simplifying this code
allows me to remove all the conversion code for gradients.
Let me know if you think it's premature and I'm happy to wait, but I really want
to see this code gone :)
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D33820
This doesn't clean up as much as a whole, but it's a step in the right
direction. In particular, it allows us to start using simple bindings for:
* Filters
* Shapes and images, almost. Need to:
* Get rid of the complex -moz- gradient parsing (let
layout.css.simple-moz-gradient.enabled get to release).
* Counters, almost. Need to:
* Share the Attr representation with Gecko, by not using Option<>.
* Just another variant should be enough (ContentItem::{Attr,Prefixedattr},
maybe).
Which in turn allows us to remove a whole lot of bindings in followups to this.
The setup changes a bit. This also removes the double pointer I complained about
while reviewing the shared UA sheet patches. The old setup is:
```
SpecifiedUrl
* CssUrl
* Arc<CssUrlData>
* String
* UrlExtraData
* UrlValueSource
* Arc<CssUrlData>
* load id
* resolved uri
* CORS mode.
* ...
```
The new one removes the double reference to the url data via URLValue, and looks
like:
```
SpecifiedUrl
* CssUrl
* Arc<CssUrlData>
* String
* UrlExtraData
* CorsMode
* LoadData
* load id
* resolved URI
```
The LoadData is the only mutable bit that C++ can change, and is not used from
Rust. Ideally, in the future, we could just use rust-url to resolve the URL
after parsing or something, and make it all immutable. Maybe.
I've verified that this approach still works with the UA sheet patches (via the
LoadDataSource::Lazy).
The reordering of mWillChange is to avoid nsStyleDisplay from going over the
size limit. We want to split it up anyway in bug 1552587, but mBinding gains a
tag member, which means that we were having a bit of extra padding.
One thing I want to explore is to see if we can abuse rustc's non-zero
optimizations to predict the layout from C++, but that's something to explore at
some other point in time and with a lot of care and help from Michael (who sits
next to me and works on rustc ;)).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31742
