Uses of `-moz-appearance: none` are changed to `appearance: none`.
Uses of other values that are simply reverting the appearance back to
its default are changed to `appearance: auto`.
Uses of values in UA sheets that are defining the inherent appearance of
widgets are changed to:
appearance: auto;
-moz-default-appearance: <value>;
since those values are either no longer supported on (-moz-)appearance,
or are still supported but only in some limited form.
There are some uses of `-moz-appearance: textfield` on <input
type=number> elements that are renamed to `appearance: textfield`.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D83430
This avoids arbitrary precision loss when computing REM units and so on,
which is particularly important if we ever change the base of our app
units (but useful regardless).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D79928
Layout 2020: Implement basic white-space: pre support
With these changes `<pre>` and `<br>` preserve spaces and force line breaks appropriately.
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#26440
- [x] There are tests for these changes
In order to test its parsing and serialization, we expose it but protect
it behind a pref.
Besides, I would like to drop layout.css.aspect-ratio-number.enabled in
the next patch because the spec has been updated. It seems we don't have
to keep this pref and we should always use Number.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D74955
This also fixes some backwards logic in nsBlockFrame::ReflowDirtyLines, and adds
some static assertions to nsGenericHTMLElement that almost cause a very subtle
bug.
Depends on D63792
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D63793
I don't think we want to keep the ugly widget hacks forever. Let me know if
you'd rather keep the property behind a pref but I don't think there's a point
in doing that.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D62649
We don't actually share _that_ much code across them. This makes callers clearer
and code less confusing, IMHO.
This also has the benefit of not autocompleting path from devtools for
shape-outside.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D62373
ImageLayer is almost the only usage of Image, so keeping them in the same enum
makes the resulting C++ struct smaller, and makes it map more cleanly to
nsStyleImage.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D62161
This adds very rudimentary support for paint order in stacking context.
In particular z-index is now handled properly, apart from issues with
hoisted fragments.
