Fetch cancellation
This PR implements cancellation for fetch, and uses it for XHR. This means that fetch clients can now send a message to the fetch task asking for the network request to be aborted.
Previously, clients like XHR had abort functionality but would implement it by simply ignoring future messages from the network task; and would not actually cancel the network fetch.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19274)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Continue http cache work
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Work in progress, and not quite worth a review yet. (Continuation of https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/4117)
TODO
- [ ] cache metadata (find some subset of`net_traits::Metadata` that can be shared across threads, it seems the problem is mainly stuff inside `hyper::header` in the `headers` field)
- [ ] determine which other fields of a `Response` need to be cached, so a full and valid one can be returned upon a cache hit.
- [ ] determine how to best share the cache across fetch threads (inside HttpState like I tried now?)
- [ ] Spend more time reading the spec and make sure the cache follows it where it matters.
- [ ] Make the current wpt tests pass.
- [ ] More...
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix#12972 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18676)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Expose some properties to chrome code, and hide some accidentally-exposed ones.
I'm adding a test for internal properties after this in Gecko.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19297)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Account for fallback content in GetFlattenedTreeParent.
Otherwise we may inappropriately style it or what not. This asserts with the
patches of bug 1414999 plus the cleanup of bug 1418456, since we no longer do
StyleNewChildren (which walks over the flattened tree children).
Too bad that GetXBLBinding is a virtual call in Gecko, probably can do just
MAY_BE_IN_BINDING_MGR...
Bug: 1418560
Reviewed-by: heycam
MozReview-Commit-ID: CNU0YdKeaR0
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19303)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Otherwise we may inappropriately style it or what not. This asserts with the
patches of bug 1414999 plus the cleanup of bug 1418456, since we no longer do
StyleNewChildren (which walks over the flattened tree children).
Too bad that GetXBLBinding is a virtual call in Gecko, probably can do just
MAY_BE_IN_BINDING_MGR...
Bug: 1418560
Reviewed-by: heycam
MozReview-Commit-ID: CNU0YdKeaR0
style: Get rid of unstyled children only traversals.
They're useless now, provided we remove the hack to not traverse XBL-bound
elements on initial styling.
Bug: 1418456
Reviewed-by: heycam
MozReview-Commit-ID: AvBVdyF1wb6
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19296)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Collect more debugging info when collecting rules of detached pseudos.
Called Option::unwrap() on a None value is not a helpful crash message.
This will hopefully help figure out what is causing bug 1418856.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19294)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
They're useless now, provided we remove the hack to not traverse XBL-bound
elements on initial styling.
Bug: 1418456
Reviewed-by: heycam
MozReview-Commit-ID: AvBVdyF1wb6
style: Move font-feature-settings outside of mako
This is a sub-PR of #19015
r? emilio
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#19290
- [x] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19293)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Use macro to impl From for font variant
As I discussed in #19277, I'd like to change the implementation for `From` of font variant to use macro, `impl_gecko_keyword_conversions`.
r? @emilio
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes update `From` impl for font variant to use macro `impl_gecko_keyword_conversions`.
- [x] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19282)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Implement EventTarget constructor
Resolves#19283
Do "Wrap" functions only created for elements that aren't marked Abstract in .webidl file?
How can I see code that was generated from webidls?
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#19283 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because they are covered by webplatform tests
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19288)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Move -moz-force-broken-image-icon out of mako
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix part of #19015.
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] These changes do not require tests because these are just refactoring.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19279)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The API for text control selection is the same for both <input> and
<textarea>:
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/form-control-infrastructure.html#textFieldSelection
Before this change, they had similar but not identical implementations
with duplicate code. Now there is a common TextControl trait which
contains the implementation used by both. As a result, some previously
failing tests now pass.
style: Move font-variant-numeric outside of mako
This is a sub-PR of #19015
r? @emilio
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#19276
- [x] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19277)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Replace "internal" properties with "enabled_in"
This allows enabling properties in ua sheets and chrome differently.
The setup is:
* enabled_in needs to be one of the four values:
["", "ua", "chrome", "content"]
* "chrome" implies "ua", and implies that they're explicitly enabled.
* "" implies the property will never be parsed.
* "content" implies the property is accessible unconditionally, modulo a pref.
Experimental still keeps trumping over those when the pref is enabled.
This PR replaces uses of internal="" by enabled_in="ua" or enabled_in="".
This may seem that it changes behavior, but since the properties where I added
enabled_in="" already unconditionally error from parse it's not.
Next step is annotating chrome-only properties.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19267)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This allows enabling properties in ua sheets and chrome differently.
The setup is:
* enabled_in needs to be one of the four values:
["", "ua", "chrome", "content"]
* "chrome" implies "ua", and implies that they're explicitly enabled.
* "" implies the property will never be parsed.
* "content" implies the property is accessible unconditionally, modulo a pref.
Experimental still keeps trumping over those when the pref is enabled.
This PR replaces uses of internal="" by enabled_in="ua" or enabled_in="".
This may seem that it changes behavior, but since the properties where I added
enabled_in="" already unconditionally error from parse it's not.
Next step is annotating chrome-only properties.
Move custom elements stuff to their own dom::bindings submodule
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
r? jdm
Moved the following functions from components/script/dom/bindings/interface.rs to a new file components/script/dom/bindings/htmlconstructor.rs:
- html_constructor()
- get_constructor_object_from_local_name()
- pop_current_element_queue()
- push_new_element_queue()
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#19179.
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19254)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Move font-variant-ligatures outside of mako
This is a sub-PR of #19015
r? @emilio
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#19246
- [x] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19253)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Add infra to differentiate chrome and UA sheets.
This keeps the behavior of stuff being accessible from chrome stylesheets being
the same of content sheets except on the UA origin. That will be changed in a
followup.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19235)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Initial steps of Mutation testing
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
- Added one strategy of mutation which is replacing occurrences && to ||.
- Added test mapping framework for running mutation tests corresponding to a mutant.
- Added one test_mapping.json to map source file in a folder to WPT test.
- Added README mentioning about Mutation testing.
- Added CI script to invoke mutation test.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes #18529 (github issue number if applicable).
- [x] These changes do not require tests because it is a python script to run mutation test and does not change any behavior.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18984)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
