That way color pickers work even when this setting is on. We always know that
pseudo-element style attributes are trusted.
Bug: 1429248
Reviewed-by: heycam
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6IdmRaMzj6I
style: Move -moz-context-properties outside of mako.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Sub-PR of #19015
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#19742 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19749)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Remove -servo-text-decorations-in-effect
It is bogus, because it depends on the display property as it's cascaded, but
the display property can change afterwards, for example, if we get blockified
because we're the root element or a flex item.
Replace it with a normal field instead.
Also, it carries some weight, because it's the last property that uses this
concept of "derived" property, and "custom cascade". So we can remove some code
after this.
Compute it after the cascade process in StyleAdjuster.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19757)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
It is bogus, because it depends on the display property as it's cascaded, but
the display property can change afterwards, for example, if we get blockified
because we're the root element or a flex item.
Replace it with a normal field instead.
Also, it carries some weight, because it's the last property that uses this
concept of "derived" property, and "custom cascade". So we can remove some code
after this.
Compute it after the cascade process in StyleAdjuster.
style: Remove -servo-display-for-hypothetical-box from longhand
This is a sub-PR of #19015
r? emilio
For the `fn set_original_display` inside `properties.mako.rs`, I removed `is_item_or_root` first to see how the tests result is. If it's needed, I'll add it back.
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#19697
- [x] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19709)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Remove TNode::set_can_be_fragmented and TNode::can_be_fragmented.
Replace them instead by a computed value flag, the same way as the
IS_IN_DISPLAY_NONE_SUBTREE flag works.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18893)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
We don't need to calculate computed animation-name or transition-property prior
to other properties any more because we no longer fill out those other
properties values in response to animation-name or transition-property length
at the time when we calculate computed property values.
This reverts commit 1970e82b0d, reversing
changes made to e882660ea6.
The reparenting logic is still bogus, but I'll figure out how to deal with that
in a bit.
In practice the only NAC that possibly inherits from a grid or flex container
are pseudos.
In Gecko, if the root element is an item container, custom anon content would
also sometimes incorrectly inherit from that (see bug 1405635), but that's fixed
in Stylo.
We remove the IS_ROOT_ELEMENT blockification from the "skip display fixup"
check, since the root element is never NAC or anything like that, so there's no
need for the check.
This also fixes some reparenting fishiness related to pseudo-elements. We were
only skipping the fixup when reparenting anon boxes, not when reparenting normal
element styles, nor when reparenting other pseudo styles which are not anon
boxes.
The style adjuster knows about the pseudo, so there's no reason to thread that
info down.
There are more simplifications that can be done in followups, cleaning a bit the
cascade flags too, those will come later.
At least when the animation-name length is bigger than the animation properties,
we mess up inheritance and only set properly the specified counts, then don't
cycle it.
The nicer fix for this is making these vectors properly, and move the cycling
logic at used-value time (bug 1420928). Same for transitions.
Bug: 1426246
Reviewed-by: hiro
MozReview-Commit-ID: 3cguzIvfMFU
style: Move text-align outside of the mako file.
I will need this refactoring before my next job. I didn't actually fix the FIXME's along the way. My other PR probably will cover these.
---
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19576)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Move will-change outside of mako
This is a sub-PR of #19015
r? emilio
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#19582
- [x] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19583)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
