This makes it so that layout is no longer generic on the node type,
depending directly on `script`'s `ServoLayoutNode`. In addition to
greatly simplifying layout, this is necessary because incremental layout
needs to be able to create pseudo-element styles without having a handle
on the original `impl LayoutNode`. We feel this is a reasonable
tradeoff.
Testing: No functional changes, so covered by existing WPT tests.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
All canvases return `Option<ImageKey>`.
Testing: Just refactor without behavior changes
Signed-off-by: sagudev <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
This is a followup to #36629, continuing to implement script-based
layout queries using the `Fragment`s attached to the `BoxTree`. In this
change, geometry queris (apart from parent offset) are calculated using
`Fragment`s hanging of the `BoxTree`.
In order to make this work, all `Fragment`s for inlines split by blocks,
need to be accessible in the `BoxTree`. This required some changes to
the way that box tree items were stored in DOM `BoxSlot`s. Now every
inline level item can have more than a single `BoxTree` item. These are
carefully collected by the `InlineFormattingContextBuilder` -- currently
a bit fragile, but with more documentation.
Testing: There are tests for these changes.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
We previously ignored the opaque layout data field inside each node when
measuring a DOM node's memory usage. While some of the reachable memory
was accounted for by measuring the layout's box tree, measuring it via
the node ensures that we don't miss anything. Since there are often Arc
values involved, this means that the layout-thread box tree measurements
now look quite small, while reported JS heap usage has increased.
Testing: Manually compared about:memory for servo.org.
---------
Signed-off-by: Josh Matthews <josh@joshmatthews.net>
Now that legacy layout has been removed, the name `layout_2020` doesn't
make much sense any longer, also it's 2025 now for better or worse. The
split between the "layout thread" and "layout" also doesn't make as much
sense since layout doesn't run on it's own thread. There's a possibility
that it will in the future, but that should be something that the user
of the crate controls rather than layout iself.
This is part of the larger layout interface cleanup and optimization
that
@Looriool and I are doing.
Testing: Covered by existing tests as this is just code movement.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
2025-04-19 10:17:03 +00:00
Renamed from components/layout_2020/dom.rs (Browse further)
