Spec: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/input.html#input-type-change
In short, this resets the selection to the start of the field when the
type has changed from one which doesn't support the selection API to one
that does.
I couldn't see an existing WPT test covering this.
Per the spec, selectionStart and selectionEnd should return the same
values regardless of the selectionDirection. (That is, selectionStart is
always less than or equal to selectionEnd; the direction then implies
which of selectionStart or selectionEnd is the cursor position.)
There was no explicit WPT test for this, so I added one.
This bug was initially quite hard to wrap my head around, and I think
part of the problem is the code in TextInput. Therefore, in the process
of fixing it I have refactored the implementation of TextInput:
* Rename selection_begin to selection_origin. This value doesn't
necessarily correspond directly to the selectionStart DOM value - in
the case of a backward selection, it corresponds to selectionEnd.
I feel that "origin" doesn't imply a specific ordering as strongly as
"begin" (or "start" for that matter) does.
* In various other cases where "begin" is used as a synonym for "start",
just use "start" for consistency.
* Implement selection_start() and selection_end() methods (and their
_offset() variants) which directly correspond to their DOM
equivalents.
* Rename other related methods to make them less wordy and more
consistent / intention-revealing.
* Add assertions to assert_ok_selection() to ensure that our assumptions
about the ordering of selection_origin and edit_point are met. This
then revealed a bug in adjust_selection_for_horizontal_change() where
the value of selection_direction was not maintained correctly (causing
a unit test failure when the new assertion failed).
Calling scroll() on an element which is not rendered (by a parent with
display: none) would previously cause a crash. In fact, we should
terminate the algorithm
[https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#dom-element-scroll] at step 10 in
this situation.
The fix hinges on implementing Element::has_css_layout_box() correctly,
rather than just returning true in all cases as we did previously.
Fixes#19430.
replace DocumentSource::NotFromParser with DocumentSource::FromParser
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
per https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/4297/files#r158729975
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19647)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
implement valid DatetimeLocal input
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
implement valid Date time Local input
part of #19172
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#19587 fix #19603(github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19602)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Unify background placement code
Merges the implementations for background-image placement
from gradients and images. Add missing parts and fix bugs.
Now supported are the CSS properties:
* background-attachment (except for local value, see #19650)
* background-clip
* background-origin
* background-position-x/y
* background-repeat
* background-size
It should be noted that backgrounds are not clipped to
rounded border corners.
(This was done before but worked only in simple cases)
See: #19649
This solves the following issues:
closes#19626closes#16657closes#19482 (examples from http://lea.verou.me/css3patterns/ are rendered perfectly but the round border is completely ignored now)
closes#19577
- `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
I enabled a few tests with the first commit but I have written about a dozen manual tests I will try to turn into ref tests either before or after this patch lands.
@bors-servo try
The relationship between the different inputs is visualized in this flowchart:
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19651)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
implement valid week string
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
implement valid week string
part of #19172
r? @KiChjang
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19559)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Use background-size, background-position properties to render
CSS gradients.
Some cleanup in display_list_builder.rs related to gradient
calculations.
Adds two wpt tests for tiled gradients.
Note: For now even gradients with background-repeat: no-repeat
are repeated. Sometimes the gradient is not repeated everywhere.
Enable vars-background-shorthand-001.html CSS test.
The selection API only applies to certain <input> types:
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#do-not-apply
This commit ensures that we handle that correctly.
Some notes:
1. TextControl::set_dom_selection_direction now calls
set_selection_range(), which means that setting selectionDirection will
now fire a selection event, as it should per the spec.
2. There is a test for the firing of the select event in
tests/wpt/web-platform-tests/html/semantics/forms/textfieldselection/select-event.html,
however the test did not run due to this syntax error:
(pid:26017) "ERROR:script::dom::bindings::error: Error at http://web-platform.test:8000/html/semantics/forms/textfieldselection/select-event.html:50:11 missing = in const declaration"
This happens due to the us of the "for (const foo of ...)" construct.
Per https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/for...of
this should actually work, so it's somewhat unsatisfying to have to
change the test.
4. If an <input>'s type is unset, it defaults to a text, and the
selection API applies. Also, if an <input>'s type is set to an
invalid value, it defaults to a text too. I've expanded the tests
to account for this second case.
I had to change the test a little bit to avoid some failures due to
color and text both having a sanitizedValue which was making the test
use the first assertion instead of the second one in some cases.
The sanitize_value implementation is pretty simple, we iterate over the
content and checks that the content is 7 characters long, that the first
character is a `#` and then that all the following characters are
hexadecimal. If all those requirements are met, we lowercase the
content, otherwise we put `#000000` in it.
Make wdspec tests runnable
This makes it possible to run tests in tests/wpt/web-platform-tests/webdriver/tests and focus on investigating why they fail.
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix (partially) #15274.
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19318)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Continue http cache work
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Work in progress, and not quite worth a review yet. (Continuation of https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/4117)
TODO
- [ ] cache metadata (find some subset of`net_traits::Metadata` that can be shared across threads, it seems the problem is mainly stuff inside `hyper::header` in the `headers` field)
- [ ] determine which other fields of a `Response` need to be cached, so a full and valid one can be returned upon a cache hit.
- [ ] determine how to best share the cache across fetch threads (inside HttpState like I tried now?)
- [ ] Spend more time reading the spec and make sure the cache follows it where it matters.
- [ ] Make the current wpt tests pass.
- [ ] More...
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix#12972 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18676)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Move assertions about the initial value of selection{Start,End} to their
own tests. This ensures that when one of these assertions fails, it
doesn't prevent other tests from being defined. Thus we have a clearer
view of which tests are passing or failing, since all tests get defined
regardless of which assertions fail.
