In particular:
- `z-index` will now work on unpositioned grid items.
- `will-change: z-index` will only establish a stacking context if
`z-index` applies, i.e. if the box is positioned or a flex/grid item.
- The conditions in `establishes_stacking_context()` are reordered,
so that the most likely ones are checked first.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Use 2024 style edition
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
* Reformat all code
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
---------
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
The specification doesn't say how to deal with percentages when
determining the minimum and maximum size of a table grid, so follow the
approach that Chromium uses.
Essentially, figure out the "missing" percentage from the non-percentage
columns and then use that to work backwards to fine the size of the
percentage ones.
This change is larger than one might expect, because this percentage
approach shouldn't happen for tables that are descendants of a flex,
grid or table container (except when there is an interceding absolute).
We have to pass this information down when building the box tree. This
will also make it easier to improve propagated text decorations in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
If an absolutely position element which is replaced has `justify-self`
or `align-self` set to `stretch`, and no inset is `auto` on that axis,
then an automatic size should behave as `stretch`, not as `fit-content`.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Some layouts like table need some style overrides. We were handling this
in `ComputedValuesExt`, but it was messy, unreliable and too limited.
For example, we were assuming that a style with `display: table` would
belong to a table wrapper box or table grid box. However, certain HTML
elements can ignore their `display` value and generate a different kind
of box. I think we aren't doing that yet, but we will need this.
Also, resolving the used border of a table needs layout information,
which we don't have in `ComputedValuesExt`. This patch will allow to
improve border collapsing in a follow-up.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
There were two kinds of layout tracing controlled by the same debugging
option:
- modern layout: Functionality that dumped a JSON serialization of the
layout tree before and after layout.
- legacy layout: A scope based tracing that reported the process of
layout in a structured way.
I don't think anyone working on layout is using either of these two
features. For modern layout requiring data structure to implement
`serde` serialization is incredibly inconvenient and also generates a
lot of extra code.
We also have a more modern tracing functionality based on perfetto that
we have started to use for layout and IMO it's actually being used and
more robust.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
It used to be an `AuOrAuto`, turning it into a `SizeConstraint` allows
passing the information about the min and max constraints when the
containing block doesn't have a definite block size.
This will be useful for table layout.
Note that in most cases we were already constructing the containing
block from a `SizeConstraint`, but we were calling `to_auto_or()` to
turn it into an `AuOrAuto`.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Push the interior mutability into enum variants of `Fragment`, so that
they can be cloned. This saves memory in the `Fragment` tree as the
`Fragment` enum is now a relatively wee 16 bytes and the interior parts
can be a variety of sizes. Before, every `Fragment` was the size of the
biggest kind (`BoxFragment` - 248 bytes).
This a step on the way toward incremental layout.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
`content_inline_size_for_table` is an override for table layout.
We only use taffy for grid layout, not for table layout.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
in each layout logic, in order to correctly resolve sizing keywords.
This patch adds a new `Sizes` struct which holds the preferred, min and
max sizing values for one axis, and unifies the logic to resolve the
final size into there.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Manage `<iframe>` size updates in `Window`. In addition to removing
duplicated code, this will allow setting `<iframe>` sizes synchronously
on child `Pipeline`s of the same origin in the script process in a
followup change. The goal is remove flakiness from `<iframe>` sizing.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Several structs and enums had a `inline_content_sizes()` method, but it
wasn't clear which ones would try to cache the result, and which ones
would always compute it.
Therefore, this performs some clarifying renaming:
- Cached ones stay as `inline_content_sizes()`
- Uncached ones become `compute_inline_content_sizes()`
Also, to simplify calls to `LayoutBoxBase::inline_content_sizes()`,
`compute_inline_content_sizes()` is moved into a new trait.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
The refactoring in 264c0f972f stopped
caching the `inline_content_sizes()` calls from:
- `FlexItemBox::layout_for_block_content_size()`
- `IndependentFormattingContext::layout_float_or_atomic_inline()`
- `TaffyContainerContext::compute_child_layout()`
Also, the call from `OutsideMarker::layout()` was never cached.
This patch caches all of them.
It's not clear at all which `inline_content_sizes()` are cached and
which aren't, so I plan to improve the situation in a follow-up.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This might make caching these values a bit easier in the future.
Correcting the visibility of `ContainingBlock` also exposed some new
rustc and clippy warnings that are fixed here.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Add a new struct `LayoutBoxBase`, that will be used throughout the box
tree. The idea of this struct is that we have a place to consistently
store common layout information (style and node information) and also to
cache layout results such as content sizes (inline and maybe later box
sizes) and eventually layout results.
In addition to the addition of this struct,
`IndependentFormattingContext` is flattened slightly so that it directly
holds the contents of both replaced and non-replaced elements.
This is only added to independent formatting contexts, but will later be
added to all block containers as well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* Refactor computation of preferred aspect ratios
Computing min/max-content sizes required a ContainingBlock in order to
resolve the padding and border when determining the preferred aspect
ratio. However, all callers already knew the padding and border, so they
can compute the ratio themselves, and pass it directly instead of
the ContainingBlock.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Put preferred aspect ratio into ConstraintSpace
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
We were using the preferred aspect ratio provided by the `aspect-ratio`
property instead of the natural aspect ratio. However, the preferred
aspect ratio should only be used to size the replaced element. To paint
the replaced contents into that element we need the natural ratio.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
