bors-servo bccb757bcd Auto merge of #19803 - jonleighton:issue-19765, r=emilio ... Implement Element::has_css_layout_box() r? emilio Here's my initial attempt to fix #19430. It seems surprisingly simple so I am wondering whether I have missed something! (Or maybe it just actually is quite simple...) Some things I am unsure about: 1. The spec seems vague about what a [CSS layout box](https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#css-layout-box) actually is. Indeed it says: "The terms CSS layout box and SVG layout box are not currently defined by CSS or SVG." 2. One thing the spec *does* say explicitly is "For the purpose of the requirements in this specification, elements that have a computed value of the display property that is table-column or table-column-group must be considered to have an associated CSS layout box (the column or column group, respectively)." I am unclear about the relevance of this, since [overflow does not apply](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow-3/#overflow-properties) to an [internal table element](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/#layout-specific-display). Therefore I haven't done anything about this explicitly, but maybe I'm missing some nuance. <!-- Reviewable:start --> --- This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19803) <!-- Reviewable:end -->		2018-01-19 14:37:57 -06:00
..
dromaeo
heartbeats
html
jquery
power
unit	Use more WebRender types in gfx/display_list	2018-01-17 23:29:57 +01:00
wpt	Auto merge of #19803 - jonleighton:issue-19765, r=emilio	2018-01-19 14:37:57 -06:00