e3009a4de9
Some of the stuff, in particular inside GeckoBindings stuff should be refactored to be less ugly and duplicate a bit less code, but the rest of the code should be landable as is. Some invalidation changes are already needed because we weren't matching with the right shadow host during invalidation (which made existing ::part() tests fail). Pending invalidation work: * Making exportparts work right on the snapshots. * Invalidating parts from descendant hosts. They're not very hard but I need to think how to best implement it: * Maybe get rid of ShadowRoot::mParts and just walk DOM descendants in the Shadow DOM. * Maybe implement a ElementHasExportPartsAttr much like HasPartAttr and use that to keep the list of elements. * Maybe invalidate :host and ::part() together in here[1] * Maybe something else. Opinions? [1]: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/131338e5017bc0283d86fb73844407b9a2155c98/servo/components/style/invalidation/element/invalidator.rs#561 Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D53730 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| attr.rs | ||
| bloom.rs | ||
| build.rs | ||
| builder.rs | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| context.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| matching.rs | ||
| nth_index_cache.rs | ||
| parser.rs | ||
| README.md | ||
| sink.rs | ||
| tree.rs | ||
| visitor.rs | ||
rust-selectors
CSS Selectors library for Rust. Includes parsing and serilization of selectors, as well as matching against a generic tree of elements. Pseudo-elements and most pseudo-classes are generic as well.
Warning: breaking changes are made to this library fairly frequently (13 times in 2016, for example). However you can use this crate without updating it that often, old versions stay available on crates.io and Cargo will only automatically update to versions that are numbered as compatible.
To see how to use this library with your own tree representation,
see Kuchiki’s src/select.rs.
(Note however that Kuchiki is not always up to date with the latest rust-selectors version,
so that code may need to be tweaked.)
If you don’t already have a tree data structure,
consider using Kuchiki itself.