Emilio Cobos Álvarez 5b62f66f6e style: Remove ThinBoxedSlice ... The only remaining consumers are ::-moz-tree pseudo-elements (we used to use ThinBoxedSlice for other data structures in the past). Those are not particularly performance sensitive so I think just double-boxing is fine. In the future, if we wanted to avoid the double indirection, we could probably use the "thin" crate (https://docs.rs/thin) or similar, which stores the length of the slice along with the allocation, making the pointer thin in all configurations, much like "ThinArc" does: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/1ce2eea39442190a71a1f8f650d098f286bf4a01/servo/components/servo_arc/lib.rs#891 In practice though, I don't think it's particularly worth it for this specific case. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D134672		2023-06-09 10:22:25 +02:00
..
Cargo.toml	style: Remove ThinBoxedSlice	2023-06-09 10:22:25 +02:00
lib.rs	style: Remove ThinBoxedSlice	2023-06-09 10:22:25 +02:00