This change removes the `effective_writing_mode` concept and tries to
properly implement right-to-left layout support for all non-inline
writing modes. In general, what needs to happen is that rectangles
need to be converted to physical rectangles using the containing block.
A right-to-left rectangle's inline start is on the right physical side
of the containing block. Likewise a positive inline offset in
right-to-left text is a negative physical one.
The implementation here is pretty good for most layout modes, but floats
are still a bit in process. Currently, floats are processed in the
logical layout of the block container, but there still might be issues
with float interaction with mixed RTL and LTR.
While this does move us closer to supporting vertical writing modes,
this is still unsupported.
New failures:
- Vertical writing mode not supported:
- `/css/CSS2/floats/floats-placement-vertical-001b.xht`
- `/css/CSS2/floats/floats-placement-vertical-001c.xht`
- Absolutes inlines should avoid floats (#33323)
- `/css/css-position/position-absolute-dynamic-static-position-floats-004.html`
- No support for grid
- `/css/css-align/self-alignment/self-align-safe-unsafe-grid-003.html`
- `/css/css-position/static-position/inline-level-absolute-in-block-level-context-009.html`
- `/css/css-position/static-position/inline-level-absolute-in-block-level-context-010.html`
- Cannot reproduce these locally on any platform. Very mysterious:
- `/css/css-tables/row-group-margin-border-padding.html`
- `/css/css-tables/row-margin-border-padding.html`
- Exposes bugs we have related to hanging whitespace in preserved
whitespace inlines:
- `/css/css-text/white-space/trailing-space-and-text-alignment-rtl-003.html`
- `/css/css-text/white-space/white-space-pre-wrap-trailing-spaces-023.html`
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Rakhi Sharma <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
- Instead of treating captions as a `BlockFormattingContext`, treat it as
a `NonReplacedFormattingContext`, which allows reusing flow layout for
captions -- fixing some issues with sizing.
- Pass in the proper size of the containing block when laying out,
fixing margin calculation.
- Follow the unspecified rules about how various size properties on
captions affect their size.
- Improve linebreaking around atomics, which is tested by
caption-related tests. This fixes intrinsic size calculation regarding
soft wrap opportunities around atomic and also makes the code making
these actual soft wrap opportunities a bit better.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
This adds initial support for table captions. To do this, the idea of
the table wrapper becomes a bit more concrete. Even so, the wrapper is
still reponsible for allocating space for the grid's border and padding,
as those properties are specified on the wrapper and not grid in CSS.
In order to account for this weirdness of HTML/CSS captions and grid are
now laid out and placed with a negative offset in the table wrapper
content rect.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
While <https://drafts.csswg.org/css-lists/#list-style-position-property> says:
> The size or contents of the marker box may affect the height of the
> principal block box and/or the height of its first line box, and in some
> cases may cause the creation of a new line box; this interaction is also
> not defined.
All other browsers ensure that the first line of list item content is
the same block size as the marker. Doing this is complicated, but we can
ensure that the entire list item is at least as tall as the marker. This
should handle the majority of cases and we can make refinements later
for stranger situations, such as when the marker is very tall.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
The only font relative unit that Servo knows how to resolve currently is
`rem` (relative to the root font size). This is because Stylo cannot do
any font queries. This adds a mechanism to allow this, exposing the
ability to properly render `ex` units in Servo.
This change only allows resolving some font size relative units thoug,
as Servo doesn't collect all the FontMetrics it needs to resolve them
all. This capability will be added in followup changes.
Some new tests fail:
- ex-unit-001.html: This test fails because Servo does not yet have
support for setting the weight using @font-face rules on web fonts.
- ex-unit-004.html: This test fails because Servo does not yet have
support for setting the Unicode range of a web font using @font-face
rules.
- first-available-font-001.html: This test fails because the above
two feature are missing.
* layout: Implement support for `line-height` and `vertical-align`
This is an initial implementation of proper `line-height` and
`vertical-align` support. While this change includes the bulk of the
work there are still many missing pieces for full support. In particular
some big missing things are:
- Flex containers do not properly compute their baselines. The idea is
to tackle this in a followup change. This causes various flex tests
to start failing because everything used to be top aligned.
- The implementation of the line-height quirks (only active in quirks
mode) are incomplete. While the quirk works in many cases, there are
still some cases where it is handled incorrectly. This requires more
redesign and refinement, better suited for a followup.
- Most of the features are CSS 3 such as precision control of the
baseline and first and last baselines are not implemented. This
change gets us close to CSS 2.x support.
While there are many new test passes with this change some tests are
starting to fail. An accounting of new failures:
Tests failing also in Layout 2013:
- /css/css2/positioning/toogle-abspos-on-relpos-inline-child.html (only passes in Chrome)
- /css/CSS2/fonts/font-applies-to-001.xht (potentially an issue with font size)
Invalid tests:
- /css/CSS2/visudet/inline-block-baseline-003.xht
- /css/CSS2/visudet/inline-block-baseline-004.xht
- These are are failing in all browsers. See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1222151.
Missing table support:
- /_mozilla/mozilla/table_valign_middle.html
Missing `font-size-adjust` support :
- /css/css-fonts/font-size-adjust-zero-2.html (also failing in 2013)
Incomplete form field support :
- /html/rendering/widgets/the-select-element/option-add-label-quirks.html (label isn't rendered so button isn't the right size in quirks mode due to line height quirk)
Need support for calculating flexbox baseline:
- /css/css-flexbox/fieldset-baseline-alignment.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flex-inline.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-multi-line-horiz-001.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-single-item-001a.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-single-item-001b.html
Failing because we don't create anonymous inline boxes for text children of blocks:
- /css/CSS2/linebox/anonymous-inline-inherit-001.html
Passes locally (potentially related to fonts):
- /css/CSS2/css1/c414-flt-fit-004.xht
- /css/css-transforms/transform-input-017.html
- /html/obsolete/requirements-for-implementations/the-marquee-element-0/marquee-min-intrinsic-size.html
- /css/css-fonts/first-available-font-005.html
- /css/css-fonts/first-available-font-006.html
* Some cleanups after live review with @mukilan
Also update results.
Improve the calculation of the block size of line boxes and all their
component elements. Even empty spans can increase the size of the line
based on their font-size. Elements that have a line-height should
increase the block size of the line, but that setting should not effect
their own size.
In addition to the new passes there are some new failures
Failing because a progression exposes the real issue these tests are
testing:
- css/css-color/t32-opacity-offscreen-multiple-boxes-1-c.xht
- css/css-color/t32-opacity-offscreen-multiple-boxes-2-c.xht
Likely failing because of vertical-align and another sizing issue:
- css/css-transforms/perspective-untransformable-no-stacking-context.html
Failing because a progression reveals another failure:
- html/rendering/non-replaced-elements/hidden-elements.html
Co-authored-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
When a box has overflow, any floats placed in that box will lower the
float ceiling into the overflow. If no float is placed in the box
though, the ceiling should be the block position where the overflow
starts. We already know where this is, because we might be passing a
negative value for the new block position after processing a box
(content_size - actual_size would be negative). This negative value
never raises the ceiling though since a maximum is used.
In the case that there is overflow, this change allows raising the
ceiling, but never passed the lowest float. This necessitates keeping
two values for the ceiling: one for floats and one for non-floats.
Fixes#30304.
layout_2020: Do linebreak for atomic inline-level elements
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#29591 (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes OR
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
