These tests use the Ahem font, so wait until fonts have been loaded.
Testing: This is a test fix.
Fixes: #37360, #37361
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
#37021 exposed that our tests are trying to load a local file path for
Ahem.ttf, but this stops working when we implement the specified CORS
protections for our font requests. Luckily, the WPT suite already
provides a same-origin version of the same font, so we can just update
our CSS to use that font face instead.
Testing: Existing WPT coverage.
Signed-off-by: Josh Matthews <josh@joshmatthews.net>
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align/#justify-block
Testing: Improves various WPT tests. `justify-self-auto-margins-2.html`
fails but I think the test is wrong.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This affects the following testsuites:
- tests/wpt/tests/
- tests/wpt/mozilla/tests/
- tests/wpt/webgl/tests/
- tests/wpt/webgpu/tests/
Testing: Several tests improve
This is part of #36315
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
The static position rect is calculated assuming that the containing
block would be established by the content box of some ancestor, but the
actual containing block is established by the padding box.
So we need to add the padding of that ancestor.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
When computing the intrinsic block size of a replaced element with a
computed preferred inline size of `auto`, instead of transferring the
final inline size through the aspect ratio, we were only transferring
the min and max constraints.
We did this to match other browsers, but Ian Kilpatrick agreed that this
is a bug and plans to change Blink.
CSSWG issue: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11236
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
If an absolutely position element which is replaced has `justify-self`
or `align-self` set to `stretch`, and no inset is `auto` on that axis,
then an automatic size should behave as `stretch`, not as `fit-content`.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Flatten and simplify Servo's preferences code. In addition, have both
preferences and options passed in as arguments to `Servo::new()` and
make sure not to use the globally set preferences in `servoshell` (as
much as possible now).
Instead of a complex procedural macro to generate preferences, just
expose a very simple derive macro that adds string based getters and
setters.
- All command-line parsing is moved to servoshell.
- There is no longer the concept of a missing preference.
- Preferences no longer have to be part of the resources bundle because
they now have reasonable default values.
- servoshell specific preferences are no longer part of the preferences
exposed by the Servo API.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
The containing block for children already has the size coming from the
style and the rules of the parent formatting context, so no need to try
to recompute it.
This allows removing a bunch of functions, and fixes some problems when
the table is a flex item.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
A box is usually sized by the formatting context in which it participates.
However, tables have some special sizing behaviors, and these were in
conflict.
Instead of letting tables attempting to re-resolve their inline table,
which failed to e.g. take flex properties into account or resolve sizing
keywords correctly, now tables will trust the inline size determined by
the parent. They will only floor it by the min-content size, and maybe
shrink the final size due to collapsed columns.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Add missing support for some alignment keywords on absolutely positioned elements
Signed-off-by: taniishkaaa <tanishkasingh2004@gmail.com>
* Check the direction of the alignment container, nits, test expectations
In this case we need to check the direction of the static position
containing block, not the actual containing block:
```html
<!DOCTYPE html>
<div style="position: relative">
<div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; width: 100px; height: 100px; border: solid; direction: rtl">
<div style="position: absolute; width: 20px; height: 20px; background: cyan; top: 20px; align-self: self-start"></div>
<div style="position: absolute; width: 20px; height: 20px; background: magenta; bottom: 20px; align-self: self-end"></div>
</div>
</div>
```
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: taniishkaaa <tanishkasingh2004@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Support justify-self on absolutely positioned elements
Signed-off-by: L Ashwin B <lashwinib@gmail.com>
* updating test expectations
Signed-off-by: L Ashwin B <lashwinib@gmail.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: L Ashwin B <lashwinib@gmail.com>
This change removes the `effective_writing_mode` concept and tries to
properly implement right-to-left layout support for all non-inline
writing modes. In general, what needs to happen is that rectangles
need to be converted to physical rectangles using the containing block.
A right-to-left rectangle's inline start is on the right physical side
of the containing block. Likewise a positive inline offset in
right-to-left text is a negative physical one.
The implementation here is pretty good for most layout modes, but floats
are still a bit in process. Currently, floats are processed in the
logical layout of the block container, but there still might be issues
with float interaction with mixed RTL and LTR.
While this does move us closer to supporting vertical writing modes,
this is still unsupported.
New failures:
- Vertical writing mode not supported:
- `/css/CSS2/floats/floats-placement-vertical-001b.xht`
- `/css/CSS2/floats/floats-placement-vertical-001c.xht`
- Absolutes inlines should avoid floats (#33323)
- `/css/css-position/position-absolute-dynamic-static-position-floats-004.html`
- No support for grid
- `/css/css-align/self-alignment/self-align-safe-unsafe-grid-003.html`
- `/css/css-position/static-position/inline-level-absolute-in-block-level-context-009.html`
- `/css/css-position/static-position/inline-level-absolute-in-block-level-context-010.html`
- Cannot reproduce these locally on any platform. Very mysterious:
- `/css/css-tables/row-group-margin-border-padding.html`
- `/css/css-tables/row-margin-border-padding.html`
- Exposes bugs we have related to hanging whitespace in preserved
whitespace inlines:
- `/css/css-text/white-space/trailing-space-and-text-alignment-rtl-003.html`
- `/css/css-text/white-space/white-space-pre-wrap-trailing-spaces-023.html`
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Rakhi Sharma <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
This implements the requirements outlined in the [flexbox specification]
about how to position absolute children of flex containers. We must
establish a static position rectangle (to use if all insets are auto)
and also align the child into that rectangle.
[flebox specification]: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#abspos-items
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
When inline atomics establish containing blocks for absolute
descendants, layout should happen with those atomics as the containing
block. This ensures that the absolute descendents have the correct
containing block and Fragment parent. This wasn't happening before and
this change fixes that.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This change removes restrictions on using the column layout mode of
flexbox and adds an initial implementation of sizing for that flex
direction. There's a lot of missing pieces still, but in some cases this
does render column flexbox.
In particular, there are now two code paths for preferred widths
(intrinsic size) calcuation: one in the main axis (row) and one in
the cross axis (column) corresponding to the flex direciton with
horizontal writing modes.
In addition, `FlexItemBox::inline_content_sizes` is removed in favor of
making `sizing::outer_inline` /
`IndependentFormattingContext::outer_inline_content_sizes` generic
enough to handle using a different value for auto minimum sizes, which
flexbox needs.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Some css-align features like gaps or alignment properties need to have
some effect on flex layout.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* layout: Take into account `display: table` etc in offset* queries
The specification says that for deciding whether an element should be
used for offset* queries, a browser should take into account whether the
element is a table cell or table. This change makes that happen.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Only tag HTML elements if they are in the HTML namespace
---------
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
While <https://drafts.csswg.org/css-lists/#list-style-position-property> says:
> The size or contents of the marker box may affect the height of the
> principal block box and/or the height of its first line box, and in some
> cases may cause the creation of a new line box; this interaction is also
> not defined.
All other browsers ensure that the first line of list item content is
the same block size as the marker. Doing this is complicated, but we can
ensure that the entire list item is at least as tall as the marker. This
should handle the majority of cases and we can make refinements later
for stranger situations, such as when the marker is very tall.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This change adds very basic support for `list-style-position`.
Currently, the marker does not do any kind of baseline alignment with
the rest
of the list item contents and it also doesn't force the list item to be
at least as tall as the marker.
This adds a few new failures:
- Four failures because markers do not ensure that list-items have at
least the same block size as they do:
- FAIL [expected PASS] /css/CSS2/lists/list-style-applies-to-012.xht
- FAIL [expected PASS] /css/CSS2/lists/list-style-applies-to-014.xht
- FAIL [expected PASS]
/css/CSS2/lists/list-style-type-applies-to-012.xht
- FAIL [expected PASS]
/css/CSS2/lists/list-style-type-applies-to-014.xht
- One failure because we don't yet support the `::marker`
pseudo-selector:
- FAIL [expected PASS]
/css/css-position/position-absolute-dynamic-list-marker.html
- One failure because we don't support the list item exception for the
line height quirk:
- FAIL [expected PASS] /quirks/line-height-in-list-item.tentative.html
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Fixes#27383.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by
`[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate
data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#27383.
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox
is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the
way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they
will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* layout: Implement support for `line-height` and `vertical-align`
This is an initial implementation of proper `line-height` and
`vertical-align` support. While this change includes the bulk of the
work there are still many missing pieces for full support. In particular
some big missing things are:
- Flex containers do not properly compute their baselines. The idea is
to tackle this in a followup change. This causes various flex tests
to start failing because everything used to be top aligned.
- The implementation of the line-height quirks (only active in quirks
mode) are incomplete. While the quirk works in many cases, there are
still some cases where it is handled incorrectly. This requires more
redesign and refinement, better suited for a followup.
- Most of the features are CSS 3 such as precision control of the
baseline and first and last baselines are not implemented. This
change gets us close to CSS 2.x support.
While there are many new test passes with this change some tests are
starting to fail. An accounting of new failures:
Tests failing also in Layout 2013:
- /css/css2/positioning/toogle-abspos-on-relpos-inline-child.html (only passes in Chrome)
- /css/CSS2/fonts/font-applies-to-001.xht (potentially an issue with font size)
Invalid tests:
- /css/CSS2/visudet/inline-block-baseline-003.xht
- /css/CSS2/visudet/inline-block-baseline-004.xht
- These are are failing in all browsers. See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1222151.
Missing table support:
- /_mozilla/mozilla/table_valign_middle.html
Missing `font-size-adjust` support :
- /css/css-fonts/font-size-adjust-zero-2.html (also failing in 2013)
Incomplete form field support :
- /html/rendering/widgets/the-select-element/option-add-label-quirks.html (label isn't rendered so button isn't the right size in quirks mode due to line height quirk)
Need support for calculating flexbox baseline:
- /css/css-flexbox/fieldset-baseline-alignment.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flex-inline.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-multi-line-horiz-001.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-single-item-001a.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-single-item-001b.html
Failing because we don't create anonymous inline boxes for text children of blocks:
- /css/CSS2/linebox/anonymous-inline-inherit-001.html
Passes locally (potentially related to fonts):
- /css/CSS2/css1/c414-flt-fit-004.xht
- /css/css-transforms/transform-input-017.html
- /html/obsolete/requirements-for-implementations/the-marquee-element-0/marquee-min-intrinsic-size.html
- /css/css-fonts/first-available-font-005.html
- /css/css-fonts/first-available-font-006.html
* Some cleanups after live review with @mukilan
Also update results.
* Update web-platform-tests to revision b'dd47ca67f55ac9df45235b2335200fb885dd1357'
* Update test expectations
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
