Spec:
https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/#dom-documentorshadowroot-adoptedstylesheets
Implement `DocumentOrShadowDOM.adoptedStylesheet`. Due to
`ObservableArray` being a massive issue on its own, it will be as it was
a `FrozenArray` at first. This approach is similar to how Gecko
implement adopted stylesheet. See
https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D144547#change-IXyOzxxFn8sU.
All of the changes will be gated behind a preference
`dom_adoptedstylesheet_enabled`.
Adopted stylesheet is implemented by adding the setter and getter of it.
While the getter works like a normal attribute getter, the setter need
to consider the inner working of document and shadow root StylesheetSet,
specifically the ordering and the invalidations. Particularly for
setter, we will clear all of the adopted stylesheet within the
StylesheetSet and readd them. Possible optimization exist, but the focus
should be directed to implementing `ObservableArray`.
More context about the implementations
https://hackmd.io/vtJAn4UyS_O0Idvk5dCO_w.
Testing: Existing WPT Coverage
Fixes: https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/37561
---------
Signed-off-by: Jo Steven Novaryo <jo.steven.novaryo@huawei.com>
I'm not sure if `CodegenRust.py` was supposed to remove the underscore,
but we end up exposing `type_` to javascript which is obviously wrong.
There's no need to rename the method in the first place, because `Type`
(with a capital T) is not a rust keyword.
Testing: Covered by existing web platform tests
---------
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
This feature is part of --enable-experimental-web-platform-features, so
it should be enabled on all tests.
This causes some new failures, but mostly it's because the tests were
timing out instead of running the failing subtests.
This is part of #36315
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Note that `StyleRule` may not have the `CssRules` readily available,
they may need to be created. So the previous approach of providing
`CSSGroupingRule` with the `CssRules` is no good: it would require
writing them in advance, just in case they end up being used.
Therefore, this removes the `CSSGroupingRule::rules` field. Instead,
they are lazily obtained in `CSSGroupingRule::rulelist()` by downcasting
and calling the appropriate method for the subclass.
Testing: covered by WPT
Fixes: #36245
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
