This only paints text in input fields. Selection and cursor are still
not painted.
In addition to adding this feature, the change also updates the
user-agent.css with the latest from the HTML specification. Extra
padding and extraneous settings (such as a bogus line-height and
min-height) are also removed from servo.css. This leads to some new
passes.
There are some new passes, this introduces failures as inserting text
reveals issues that were hidden before. Notably:
- failures in `/html/editing/editing-0/spelling-and-grammar-checking/`:
We do not support spell-checking.
- Most of the rest of the new failures are missing features of input
boxes that are also missing in legacy layout.
* layout: Take into account `display: table` etc in offset* queries
The specification says that for deciding whether an element should be
used for offset* queries, a browser should take into account whether the
element is a table cell or table. This change makes that happen.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Only tag HTML elements if they are in the HTML namespace
---------
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
It was providing a length whenever the element generates a box.
However, these properties don't apply to non-replaced inlines,
so the computed value should be provided instead.
This change adds a very simple implementation of `border-collapse` for
tables. No harmonization or merging is done at all for borders. Instead,
the largest border for every continuous border sets the size. Instead of
merging different border styles, they are squashed to half size -- which
isn't great, but ensures appropriate positioning.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
While <https://drafts.csswg.org/css-lists/#list-style-position-property> says:
> The size or contents of the marker box may affect the height of the
> principal block box and/or the height of its first line box, and in some
> cases may cause the creation of a new line box; this interaction is also
> not defined.
All other browsers ensure that the first line of list item content is
the same block size as the marker. Doing this is complicated, but we can
ensure that the entire list item is at least as tall as the marker. This
should handle the majority of cases and we can make refinements later
for stranger situations, such as when the marker is very tall.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This change adds very basic support for `list-style-position`.
Currently, the marker does not do any kind of baseline alignment with
the rest
of the list item contents and it also doesn't force the list item to be
at least as tall as the marker.
This adds a few new failures:
- Four failures because markers do not ensure that list-items have at
least the same block size as they do:
- FAIL [expected PASS] /css/CSS2/lists/list-style-applies-to-012.xht
- FAIL [expected PASS] /css/CSS2/lists/list-style-applies-to-014.xht
- FAIL [expected PASS]
/css/CSS2/lists/list-style-type-applies-to-012.xht
- FAIL [expected PASS]
/css/CSS2/lists/list-style-type-applies-to-014.xht
- One failure because we don't yet support the `::marker`
pseudo-selector:
- FAIL [expected PASS]
/css/css-position/position-absolute-dynamic-list-marker.html
- One failure because we don't support the list item exception for the
line height quirk:
- FAIL [expected PASS] /quirks/line-height-in-list-item.tentative.html
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Fixes#27383.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by
`[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate
data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#27383.
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox
is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the
way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they
will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Update raw lags path for WPT import
I forgot to do this in #31616
* Update web-platform-tests to revision b'298d1599dbf6255aea63506daaa1702ff0c4fdc5'
---------
Co-authored-by: Samson <16504129+sagudev@users.noreply.github.com>
Put table cell content fragments into a hieararchy of fragments that
include their table row and table row group fragments. This ensures that
things like relative positioning and transforms set on rows and row
groups properly affect cells and cell content.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Anonymous tables should not use legacy pseudos, as the legacy layout
engine had them inherit lots of random properites that lead to bad
layout in the new layout engine.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Fix size of tables in flow layout
The contents of a table can make it bigger than what we would expect
from its 'width', 'min-width', 'height' and ' min-height' properties.
Also, 'width: auto' doesn't stretch it to fill the containing block.
We had to refactor the resolution of margins to happen after layout,
otherwise 'auto' margins wouldn't align correctly.
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* Feedback
* Consistently use `containing_block_for_table` in table layout
* Update test result
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
This deviates from css2, but it's mandated by css-align, and matches
what other browsers do when no margin is 'auto'.
When some margin is 'auto', this should keep the proper round-tripping
behavior that Gecko and WebKit lack, and Blink recently adopted.
* <hr> elements are expected to have a default overflow:hidden
See https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/2724
Signed-off-by: Sebastian C <sebsebmc@gmail.com>
* Use full defined hr style
Signed-off-by: Sebastian C <sebsebmc@gmail.com>
* update legacy test expectation
Signed-off-by: Sebastian C <sebsebmc@gmail.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Sebastian C <sebsebmc@gmail.com>
* layout: Implement support for `line-height` and `vertical-align`
This is an initial implementation of proper `line-height` and
`vertical-align` support. While this change includes the bulk of the
work there are still many missing pieces for full support. In particular
some big missing things are:
- Flex containers do not properly compute their baselines. The idea is
to tackle this in a followup change. This causes various flex tests
to start failing because everything used to be top aligned.
- The implementation of the line-height quirks (only active in quirks
mode) are incomplete. While the quirk works in many cases, there are
still some cases where it is handled incorrectly. This requires more
redesign and refinement, better suited for a followup.
- Most of the features are CSS 3 such as precision control of the
baseline and first and last baselines are not implemented. This
change gets us close to CSS 2.x support.
While there are many new test passes with this change some tests are
starting to fail. An accounting of new failures:
Tests failing also in Layout 2013:
- /css/css2/positioning/toogle-abspos-on-relpos-inline-child.html (only passes in Chrome)
- /css/CSS2/fonts/font-applies-to-001.xht (potentially an issue with font size)
Invalid tests:
- /css/CSS2/visudet/inline-block-baseline-003.xht
- /css/CSS2/visudet/inline-block-baseline-004.xht
- These are are failing in all browsers. See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1222151.
Missing table support:
- /_mozilla/mozilla/table_valign_middle.html
Missing `font-size-adjust` support :
- /css/css-fonts/font-size-adjust-zero-2.html (also failing in 2013)
Incomplete form field support :
- /html/rendering/widgets/the-select-element/option-add-label-quirks.html (label isn't rendered so button isn't the right size in quirks mode due to line height quirk)
Need support for calculating flexbox baseline:
- /css/css-flexbox/fieldset-baseline-alignment.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flex-inline.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-multi-line-horiz-001.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-single-item-001a.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-single-item-001b.html
Failing because we don't create anonymous inline boxes for text children of blocks:
- /css/CSS2/linebox/anonymous-inline-inherit-001.html
Passes locally (potentially related to fonts):
- /css/CSS2/css1/c414-flt-fit-004.xht
- /css/css-transforms/transform-input-017.html
- /html/obsolete/requirements-for-implementations/the-marquee-element-0/marquee-min-intrinsic-size.html
- /css/css-fonts/first-available-font-005.html
- /css/css-fonts/first-available-font-006.html
* Some cleanups after live review with @mukilan
Also update results.
* Update web-platform-tests to revision b'dd47ca67f55ac9df45235b2335200fb885dd1357'
* Update test expectations
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Improve the calculation of the block size of line boxes and all their
component elements. Even empty spans can increase the size of the line
based on their font-size. Elements that have a line-height should
increase the block size of the line, but that setting should not effect
their own size.
In addition to the new passes there are some new failures
Failing because a progression exposes the real issue these tests are
testing:
- css/css-color/t32-opacity-offscreen-multiple-boxes-1-c.xht
- css/css-color/t32-opacity-offscreen-multiple-boxes-2-c.xht
Likely failing because of vertical-align and another sizing issue:
- css/css-transforms/perspective-untransformable-no-stacking-context.html
Failing because a progression reveals another failure:
- html/rendering/non-replaced-elements/hidden-elements.html
Co-authored-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
* Sort stacking contexts and stacking containers by painting order
* fix stealing of stacking containers; fix interleaving with fragments
* actually positioned stacking containers should be stolen too
* update expectations and clean up panic changes
* rework naming and docs
* rename s_c_a_p_s_c to real_s_c_a_p_s_c; fix docs
* rename InlineStackingContainer to AtomicInlineStackingContainer
* rework debug logging to use PrintTree
* clean up docs and PrintTree output
* don't panic unless cfg!(debug_assertions) is true
* update expectations
* Update web-platform-tests to revision b'50e91f3cfd1140cafc188516488f2dca289239af'
* Delete flaky result for css2/linebox/vertical-align-baseline-002
* Delete flaky result for html/rendering/bindings/the-textarea-element-0/cols-default.html.ini
* Delete flaky result for CSS2/lists/list-style-applies-to-001.xht.ini
---------
Co-authored-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
Most tests were only being run for layout-2013, not for layout-2020.
This wasn't great since layout-2020 is now the default.
So this patch unifies the lists of included tests for both layouts.
For layout-2013 this implies adding css/css-content/, css/css-logical/
and css/css-masking/clip/.
For layout-2020 this implies adding several additional css tests, and
also tests like dom/, js/, html/, etc.
