This patch introduces infrastructure for the rule tree, and constructs it.
We don't use it yet, nor have good heuristics for GC'ing it, but this should not
happen anymore once we store the rule node reference in the node.
I haven't messed up with memory orders because I want to do a try run with it,
then mess with them.
Take down the ApplicableDeclarationsCache, use the rule tree for doing the cascade.
layout/context: Wrap `image_cache_thread` in a `Mutex<>` as well
`SharedLayoutContext.image_cache_thread` didn't get the `Mutex<>`
treatment along with all the other channels in there, because
`ipc-channel::Sender` is presently inherently `Sync`. I believe this to
be an implementation accident though, that should be rectified in the
future -- not something users should actually rely on...
Note that sharing senders (be it `mpsc` or `ipc-channel`) in is probably
not a good idea anyway: just cloning them -- and letting them handle the
sharing internally -- should be both simpler and cheaper. But right now
that's how things are handled here; so let's go with the flow...
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/14048)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
`SharedLayoutContext.image_cache_thread` didn't get the `Mutex<>`
treatment along with all the other channels in there, because
`ipc-channel::Sender` is presently inherently `Sync`. I believe this to
be an implementation accident though, that should be rectified in the
future -- not something users should actually rely on...
Note that sharing senders (be it `mpsc` or `ipc-channel`) in is probably
not a good idea anyway: just cloning them -- and letting them handle the
sharing internally -- should be both simpler and cheaper. But right now
that's how things are handled here; so let's go with the flow...
Layers were a feature of the legacy drawing path. If we re-add them at
some point, it probably makes more sense to make them a product of
display list inspection.
This change also remove a bunch of dead painting code.
This removes paint threads, rust-layers dependency, and changes
optional webrender types to be required.
The use_webrender option has been removed, however I've left
the "-w" command line option in place so that wpt
runner can continue to pass that. Once it's removed from there
we can also remove the -w option.
Once this stage is complete, it should be fine to change the
display list building code to generate webrender display
lists directly and avoid the conversion step.
As a follow-up, we could move all the data living under a mutex in the
SharedLayoutContext only in order to create the local context to the same place.
This should increase animation performance when there are multiple animations in
one page that happen to be on different threads.
This is the first part of #10185. More to follow. I have built this locally with both servo and geckolib without errors; let's see if it succeeds on all platforms as well.
Generalize the style structs
This allows geckolib to pass gecko style structs and have the style system write to them directly, provided we implement all the traits.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10155)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
over the data as well.
WebRender doesn't need the data, as it acquires it separately.
About a 50%-100% improvement in display list building time on
browser.html.
PR #9208 added the ability to perform layout before an `<img>` resource is
fully loaded. However, when we are rendering to an image file for testing
purposes, we need to block until the image content is fully loaded (until
issue #9441 is fixed).
Fixes#9550.
This commit refactors the style crate to be completely independent of
the actual implementation and pseudo-elements supported.
This also adds a gecko backend which introduces parsing for the
anonymous box pseudo-elements[1], although there's still no way of
querying them.
https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/style/nsCSSAnonBoxList.h
We do a few things-here:
* Hoist non-layout-dependent fields in SharedLayoutData and LocalLayoutData into style/.
* Hoist parts of css/matching.rs into style/.
* Hoist parts of layout/animation.rs into style/animation.rs.
* Remove the duplicated-but-slightly-different definition of OpaqueNode.
animations complete or are interrupted.
This adds a new pair of reader-writer locks. I measured the performance
of style recalculation on Wikipedia and the overhead of the locks was
not measurable.
Closes#7816.
