Remove HTMLCollectionElementsRevIter
It's almost a duplicate of HTMLCollectionElementsIter, aside from that its node_iter is a PrecedingNodeIter. We can simply use dynamic dispatch for node_iter instead of making it a concrete type.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10094)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
some object needs to be repainted.
Reduces CPU usage when mousing over simple documents. (More complex
documents tend to trigger unnecessary reflow bugs and so still have high
CPU.)
Part of #9999.
Add Python 3 compatibility to Android symbol checker
Make the script that checks for undefined Android symbols compatible
with both Python 2 and Python 3, to allow for future updates to the
default system Python on our build machines.
I'd like to land this before https://github.com/servo/saltfs/pull/249.
We currently use Ubuntu 14.04 (an LTS release); Ubuntu is aiming for Python 3 as the default Python in the next LTS release, 16.04, and I'd like to have any scripts be ready for the transition.
Do we have a Python 2/3 compatibility policy?
cc @cengizIO @larsbergstrom
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10097)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Make the script that checks for undefined Android symbols compatible
with both Python 2 and Python 3, to allow for future updates to the
default system Python on our build machines.
I'd like to land this before https://github.com/servo/saltfs/pull/249.
We currently use Ubuntu 14.04 (an LTS release); Ubuntu is aiming for
Python 3 as the default Python in the next LTS release, 16.04, and
I'd like to have any scripts be ready for the transition.
Details ui
Requires a patch to rust-selectors, and doesn't currently recalculate the styles correctly (which is needed to make actual toggling work correctly).
Still trying to figure out what it takes to get style recalc to do what this needs.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="40" alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/9586)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
add a new command line flag --profile-dir [path]
add a new command line flag --profile-dir [path] that stores an optional directory path in the Opts struct in opts.rs, creating the directory if it does not exist.
For the Implement HTTP authorization UI and persistent sessions student project.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10087)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
layout: Move overflow calculation to be a separate, sequential, bottom-up pass.
Right now, the only reason that overflow calculation works is that we
rely on script inducing extra reflows that are sent for display. This
was preventing #10021 from landing.
This change regresses layout performance by about 1% in my tests.
Fixes#7797 properly.
r? @mbrubeck
cc @glennw
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10064)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
implement and use From<bool> for enum and back
as discussed in the #servo channel on IRC:
implement and use `From<bool>` for `EventBubbles` (and back direction)
implement and use `From<bool>` for `EventCancelable` (and back direction)
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10066)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This pulls in https://github.com/servo/ipc-channel/pull/52 , and
especially 8e2357604f7af8869b489b9682a2cf8b58177637, which fixes another
likely cause of intermittent failures on GNU/Linux.
bottom-up pass.
Right now, the only reason that overflow calculation works is that we
rely on script inducing extra reflows that are sent for display. This
was preventing #10021 from landing.
This change regresses layout performance by about 1% in my tests.
Fixes#7797 properly.
Refactor the cascade
Converting the specified value of some properties into a computed value depends on the value of other properties. For example, the `em` unit of any length depends on the `font-size` property.
Previously, we would do a first pass over applicable declarations to build up a `values::computed::Context` struct with a number of fields for each such piece of data from other properties.
This simplies the struct by instead having it contain the set of computed values (for a given element) that is being populated and classify properties into "early" and "other", such that the only dependencies can be from "other" to "early". We iterate applicable_declarations twice, first cascading "early" properties then "other". Unfortunately, it’s not easy to check that this classification is correct.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="40" alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/9929)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Converting the specified value of some properties into a computed value
depends on the value of other properties. For example, the `em` unit
of any length depends on the `font-size` property.
Previously, we would do a first pass over applicable declarations
to build up a `values::computed::Context` struct with a number of fields
for each such piece of data from other properties.
This simplies the struct by instead having it contain the
set of computed values (for a given element) that is being populated
and classify properties into "early" and "other",
such that the only dependencies can be from "other" to "early".
We iterate applicable_declarations twice, first cascading "early" properties
then "other".
Unfortunately, it’s not easy to check that this classification is correct.
Add wpt tests for send
Add wpt tests for send that do not set the responseType and compare the result against a string.
Fixes#9357
r? @KiChjang
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/9971)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
