The first commit refactors the fragment parsing and innerHTML setter. This makes the code mirror the structure of the spec more closely, and also prepares for reusing code with the outerHTML setter.
In my mistake, I close PR for this commit.
I'm sorry for inconvenience.
@jdm 's comment
The test expectations for /tests/wpt/web-platform-tests/html/dom/interfaces.html and /tests/wpt/web-platform-tests/workers/interfaces.workers.js will need to be updated - http://mxr.mozilla.org/servo/search?string=appversion
According to your guide, I revised commit. Is this your intention?
r? @jdm
cc @yichoi
Transition events are not yet supported, and the only animatable
properties are `top`, `right`, `bottom`, and `left`. However, all other
features of transitions are supported. There are no automated tests at
present because I'm not sure how best to test it, but three manual tests
are included.
Based on [ebalint](https://github.com/ebalint)'s original patch, this commit implements the linear and radial gradients for the canvas. The PR also includes test cases.
Depends on #4623 and servo/rust-azure#136.
@jdm This initial version has a few outstanding issues that I wanted to invite input on. Specifically:
1. I had some difficulty finding a home for the `StorageType` enum. Structs defined outside of the `script` module don't seem to be able to use the `#[jstraceable]` annotation and the `net` module (where `StorageTask` lives) doesn't have access to `script`. Per Simon Sapin's suggestion, I worked around this temporarily by creating a `TraceableStorageType` stand-in struct that was traceable and which could be translated into a regular `StorageType` when being sent to the `StorageTask`. Unsure of the best way to resolve this hack. Thoughts?
2. Apart from the `Storage` constructor used in `Window::SessionStorage` and the new `Window::LocalStorage`, there's also a method called `Storage::Constructor`. I'm unclear on what (if anything) will actually invoke this, so I'm not sure which variant of `StorageType` to use here. I've temporarily created an `Unknown` variant of `StorageType` as a placeholder.
3. I discovered that the web platform tests directory's localStorage tests. Many of them now pass despite the configured expectation that they fail. However, several do not pass. Is there a good way for me to add debug logging or otherwise get a sense of which assertion failed / what went wrong?
Thanks for your continued help!
