Servo currently uses `heapsize`, but Stylo/Gecko use `malloc_size_of`.
`malloc_size_of` is better -- it handles various cases that `heapsize` does not
-- so this patch changes Servo to use `malloc_size_of`.
This patch makes the following changes to the `malloc_size_of` crate.
- Adds `MallocSizeOf` trait implementations for numerous types, some built-in
(e.g. `VecDeque`), some external and Servo-only (e.g. `string_cache`).
- Makes `enclosing_size_of_op` optional, because vanilla jemalloc doesn't
support that operation.
- For `HashSet`/`HashMap`, falls back to a computed estimate when
`enclosing_size_of_op` isn't available.
- Adds an extern "C" `malloc_size_of` function that does the actual heap
measurement; this is based on the same functions from the `heapsize` crate.
This patch makes the following changes elsewhere.
- Converts all the uses of `heapsize` to instead use `malloc_size_of`.
- Disables the "heapsize"/"heap_size" feature for the external crates that
provide it.
- Removes the `HeapSizeOf` implementation from `hashglobe`.
- Adds `ignore` annotations to a few `Rc`/`Arc`, because `malloc_size_of`
doesn't derive those types, unlike `heapsize`.
This patch replaces the handwritten MallocSizeOf implementation for
PropertyDeclaration with a derived one, which gives much more thorough
measurement.
This requires (a) deriving MallocSizeOf for a *lot* of additional types (most
of which already have `derive(HeapSizeOf)` in Servo builds), and (b)
implementing MallocSizeOf for a few more types in the `malloc_size_of` crate.
These changes would significantly improve the reporting coverage for gmail if
it weren't for the fact that SpecifiedUrl isn't measured due to a lack of
clarity about its fields; that can be fixed as a follow-up once bug 1397971 has
landed.
Remove style/testing feature
We added this because a year ago we had no reliable Gecko CI. This meant that Gecko-only properties needed to be tested *somehow*, and we solved that by making it so that for unit tests we compile all properties, not just the servo ones.
This was useful back then, but I don't think we need this anymore. We have reliable Gecko CI, and all the gecko-only stuff we tested is adequately handled by the properties-database parsing mochitests. It's a bit of annoying cruft that just complicates things; we probably should remove it.
r? @emilio or @SimonSapin
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/17984)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
NonNegativeNumber: for -moz-box-flex, flex-grow, and flex-shrink.
GreaterThanOrEqualToOneNumber: for stroke-miterlimit.
MozReview-Commit-ID: Kgbt99BPdVA
