This is the basic structure of the stuff. Following patches will fill
the gap between Gecko and Servo on value generating, and finally hook
it into InspectorUtils.
Bug: 1434130
Reviewed-by: emilio
MozReview-Commit-ID: KNLAfFBiY6e
System font keywords are not a valid value for those properties.
The newly-added #[css(skip)] would be reused by deriving algorithm of
SpecifiedValueInfo to skip them as well.
Bug: 1434130
Reviewed-by: emilio
MozReview-Commit-ID: EmnhkaA9RR5
Shipped since Firefox 48, other browsers have similar impls, and the related
spec has been in CR since a while ago.
The syntax of this property as implemented should be considered to be pretty
stable, so we can remove this pref.
Bug: 1417761
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: H7lDsdbUamD
Most of types just derive it using proc_macro directly. Some of value
types need manual impl.
In my current plan, this new trait will be used in bug 1434130 to expose
values as well.
Bug: 1455576
Reviewed-by: emilio
MozReview-Commit-ID: LI7fy45VkRw
I didn't bother not shifting there. We need to load the whole thing and shift
for at least one of cascade level / shadow cascade order.
Callers of level() other than for_rule_tree are non-existent in release builds,
so we'd be doing the shift anyway. I can implement the same thing for
shadow_cascade_order too, but I don't think that optimization is measurable in
any way, either, the compiler should make the decision.
And just in case, the simpler version actually generated less instructions in:
https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=ceadb0d3cbce4eeca76e4d9ab9a1c744&version=nightly
with the simple thing.
Bug: 1455032
Reviewed-by: heycam
MozReview-Commit-ID: 8xPBJmlcyKh
If I had to write that again I would've killed myself :).
This is still not perfect, and the system font code is still quite a mess, but
well, little steps.
Bug: 1455358
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: BmrZlCSejo7
These won't "just work", pending changes from bug 1436048 to use a floating
point representation for those.
Bug: 1454883
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: Bi5iTdFreMA
No cleaner ideas right now that carrying that counter around... Maybe a custom
type may be cleaner?
This makes ApplicableDeclarationBlock a bit bigger. I could probably try to make
the counter a 4 / 5-bit number or something and pack the counter there in the
SourceOrderAndCascadeLevel somehow...
But doesn't seem really worth the churn, and can be done as a followup in any
case. Let me know if you want to block on that.
Bug: 1454162
Reviewed-by: heycam
MozReview-Commit-ID: 1LdW9S4xA6f
Note that we also drop the dead optional aReusableSheets argument from
the async parsing path, since it was always null.
Bug: 1346988
Reviewed-by: bz,emilio
MozReview-Commit-ID: KddpGFdaqEe
Delegate resource reading to embedder
Now the embedder provides the content of the files itself. Now, on Android, we can use regular assets instead of unzipping all the resources on the scared at startup.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach build-geckolib` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#15635 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20533)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The test document_domain_setter.html now fails, but AFAIK the origin
comparison can never be true (document.origin is the unprefixed domain,
while the loaded iframe is from www1.…), and that test fails in all
major browsers because of security exceptions anyway.
