added spec comments for progressive web metrics
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
r? @asajeffrey
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach build-geckolib` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#20624 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because it's a comment
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20626)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Replace initial about:blank loads
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach build-geckolib` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#14720 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20579)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Run rustfmt on selectors, servo_arc, and style
Now that rustfmt is getting close to stable, and work on the style system has died down a bit, it seemed like an opportune time to auto-format the style crates.
The first commit disables import reordering, since tidy and rustfmt don't currently agree on the correct ordering. The second commit does a bunch of manual fixups such that the output of rustfmt passes tidy. The third commit runs rustfmt on the three aforementioned crate.
There are a few dozen warnings in the style crate about lines longer than 100 characters. It would be good to fix these, but I don't have time for that now.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20603)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Simplify border-image-repeat serialization.
We're the only ones to preserve explicitly the second keyword, as noticed in:
https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/10170
Reland of #20610 because it got backed out because I wasn't paying attention to IRC.
Use the incumbent global as the source of x-origin postMessage
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach build-geckolib` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#20604 (github issue number if applicable).
- [X] These changes do not require tests because it's already caught by existing WPT
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20614)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Backed out changeset d186bcce1235 for failing on layout/style/test/test_shorthand_property_getters.html on a CLOSED TREE
Backed out changeset d186bcce1235 for failing on layout/style/test/test_shorthand_property_getters.html on a CLOSED TREE
Backs out https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/20610
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20613)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Don't make logical properties animatable
|animation_type| was renamed in 94fb839fdd, but the commit missed renaming
one place. It means that some of logical properties might have been
accidentally animatable. Logical properties should be animatable but we
haven't yet implemented the proper Animate trait for logical properties.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20602)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Implement the functional :host(..) selector.
We could invalidate in a slightly more fine-grained way, but I don't think it's
worth the churn vs. keeping the special-cases minimal.
Bug: 1452640
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5DkQrgwg9GW
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20606)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
We could invalidate in a slightly more fine-grained way, but I don't think it's
worth the churn vs. keeping the special-cases minimal.
Bug: 1452640
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: 5DkQrgwg9GW
|animation_type| was renamed in 94fb839fdd, but the commit missed renaming
one place. It means that some of logical properties might have been
accidentally animatable. Logical properties should be animatable but we
haven't yet implemented the proper Animate trait for logical properties.
style: Implement the non-functional :host selector.
Kinda tricky because :host only matches rules on the shadow root where the rules
come from. So we need to be careful during invalidation and style sharing.
I didn't use the non_ts_pseudo_class_list bits because as soon as we implement
the :host(..) bits we're going to need to special-case it anyway.
The general schema is the following:
* Rightmost featureless :host selectors are handled inserting them in the
host_rules hashmap. Note that we only insert featureless stuff there. We
could insert all of them and just filter during matching, but that's slightly
annoying.
* The other selectors, like non-featureless :host or what not, are added to the
normal cascade data. This is harmless, since the shadow host rules are never
matched against the host, so we know they'll just never match, and avoids
adding more special-cases.
* Featureless :host selectors to the left of a combinator are handled during
matching, in the special-case of next_element_for_combinator in selectors.
This prevents this from being more invasive, and keeps the usual fast path
slim, but it's a bit hard to match the spec and the implementation.
We could keep a copy of the SelectorIter instead in the matching context to
make the handling of featureless-ness explicit in match_non_ts_pseudo_class,
but we'd still need the special-case anyway, so I'm not fond of it.
* We take advantage of one thing that makes this sound. As you may have
noticed, if you had `root` element which is a ShadowRoot, and you matched
something like `div:host` against it, using a MatchingContext with
current_host == root, we'd incorrectly report a match. But this is impossible
due to the following constraints:
* Shadow root rules aren't matched against the host during styling (except
these featureless selectors).
* DOM APIs' current_host needs to be the _containing_ host, not the element
itself if you're a Shadow host.
Bug: 992245
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: KayYNfTXb5h
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20597)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Kinda tricky because :host only matches rules on the shadow root where the rules
come from. So we need to be careful during invalidation and style sharing.
I didn't use the non_ts_pseudo_class_list bits because as soon as we implement
the :host(..) bits we're going to need to special-case it anyway.
The general schema is the following:
* Rightmost featureless :host selectors are handled inserting them in the
host_rules hashmap. Note that we only insert featureless stuff there. We
could insert all of them and just filter during matching, but that's slightly
annoying.
* The other selectors, like non-featureless :host or what not, are added to the
normal cascade data. This is harmless, since the shadow host rules are never
matched against the host, so we know they'll just never match, and avoids
adding more special-cases.
* Featureless :host selectors to the left of a combinator are handled during
matching, in the special-case of next_element_for_combinator in selectors.
This prevents this from being more invasive, and keeps the usual fast path
slim, but it's a bit hard to match the spec and the implementation.
We could keep a copy of the SelectorIter instead in the matching context to
make the handling of featureless-ness explicit in match_non_ts_pseudo_class,
but we'd still need the special-case anyway, so I'm not fond of it.
* We take advantage of one thing that makes this sound. As you may have
noticed, if you had `root` element which is a ShadowRoot, and you matched
something like `div:host` against it, using a MatchingContext with
current_host == root, we'd incorrectly report a match. But this is impossible
due to the following constraints:
* Shadow root rules aren't matched against the host during styling (except
these featureless selectors).
* DOM APIs' current_host needs to be the _containing_ host, not the element
itself if you're a Shadow host.
Bug: 992245
Reviewed-by: xidorn
MozReview-Commit-ID: KayYNfTXb5h
It doesn't actually matter because this is only called from
WebGLRenderingContext::BindTexture, which already checks the target,
but better be safe than sorry.
Have CSSOM append rather than replace slot in declaration block
The early return for identical setting in importance matching as well as the comment before `index_to_remove` are removed because the order is web-exposing regardless of whether it's from CSSOM or parsing. e.g. `top: 1px; left: 2px; top: 1px;` is effectively `left: 2px; top: 1px;`,
not `top: 1px; left: 2px;`.
This is patch for [bug 1415330](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1415330), for spec change in w3c/csswg-drafts#2516. And corresponding test will be added in w3c/web-platform-tests#10354.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20582)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The early return for identical setting in importance matching as well
as the comment before `index_to_remove` are removed because the order
is web-exposing regardless of whether it's from CSSOM or parsing. e.g.
`top: 1px; left: 2px; top: 1px;` is effectively `left: 2px; top: 1px;`,
not `top: 1px; left: 2px;`.
