* Use 2024 style edition
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
* Reformat all code
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
---------
Signed-off-by: Simon Wülker <simon.wuelker@arcor.de>
We were always treating an indefinite `stretch` as the automatic size.
This instead treats it as `0px` on min sizing properties, and as `none`
on max sizing properties, aligning with Blink and this recent CSSWG
resolution: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11006
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
A box is usually sized by the formatting context in which it participates.
However, tables have some special sizing behaviors that we implemented
with a `content_inline_size_for_table` override.
However, breaking the assumptions of the formatting context isn't great.
It was also bad for performance that we could try to layout a table
among floats even though it wouldn't en up fitting because of a larger
min-content size.
Therefore, this changes the logic so that formatting contexts use some
special sizing for tables, and then tables only override that amount
when there are collapsed columns. Eventually, we should try to remove
that case too, see https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/11408
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Instead of setting up a route for every image load in the DOM / Layout,
route all incoming image cache responses through the `ScriptThread`.
This avoids creating a set of file descriptor for every image that is
loaded.
This change requires having the `ImageCache` track the `PipelineId` of
the original the listener so that the `ScriptThread` can route it
properly to the correct `Window`.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
If an absolutely position element which is replaced has `justify-self`
or `align-self` set to `stretch`, and no inset is `auto` on that axis,
then an automatic size should behave as `stretch`, not as `fit-content`.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Some layouts like table need some style overrides. We were handling this
in `ComputedValuesExt`, but it was messy, unreliable and too limited.
For example, we were assuming that a style with `display: table` would
belong to a table wrapper box or table grid box. However, certain HTML
elements can ignore their `display` value and generate a different kind
of box. I think we aren't doing that yet, but we will need this.
Also, resolving the used border of a table needs layout information,
which we don't have in `ComputedValuesExt`. This patch will allow to
improve border collapsing in a follow-up.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
There were two kinds of layout tracing controlled by the same debugging
option:
- modern layout: Functionality that dumped a JSON serialization of the
layout tree before and after layout.
- legacy layout: A scope based tracing that reported the process of
layout in a structured way.
I don't think anyone working on layout is using either of these two
features. For modern layout requiring data structure to implement
`serde` serialization is incredibly inconvenient and also generates a
lot of extra code.
We also have a more modern tracing functionality based on perfetto that
we have started to use for layout and IMO it's actually being used and
more robust.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
It used to be an `AuOrAuto`, turning it into a `SizeConstraint` allows
passing the information about the min and max constraints when the
containing block doesn't have a definite block size.
This will be useful for table layout.
Note that in most cases we were already constructing the containing
block from a `SizeConstraint`, but we were calling `to_auto_or()` to
turn it into an `AuOrAuto`.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Push the interior mutability into enum variants of `Fragment`, so that
they can be cloned. This saves memory in the `Fragment` tree as the
`Fragment` enum is now a relatively wee 16 bytes and the interior parts
can be a variety of sizes. Before, every `Fragment` was the size of the
biggest kind (`BoxFragment` - 248 bytes).
This a step on the way toward incremental layout.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
in each layout logic, in order to correctly resolve sizing keywords.
This patch adds a new `Sizes` struct which holds the preferred, min and
max sizing values for one axis, and unifies the logic to resolve the
final size into there.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Manage `<iframe>` size updates in `Window`. In addition to removing
duplicated code, this will allow setting `<iframe>` sizes synchronously
on child `Pipeline`s of the same origin in the script process in a
followup change. The goal is remove flakiness from `<iframe>` sizing.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Several structs and enums had a `inline_content_sizes()` method, but it
wasn't clear which ones would try to cache the result, and which ones
would always compute it.
Therefore, this performs some clarifying renaming:
- Cached ones stay as `inline_content_sizes()`
- Uncached ones become `compute_inline_content_sizes()`
Also, to simplify calls to `LayoutBoxBase::inline_content_sizes()`,
`compute_inline_content_sizes()` is moved into a new trait.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This might make caching these values a bit easier in the future.
Correcting the visibility of `ContainingBlock` also exposed some new
rustc and clippy warnings that are fixed here.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Consider this testcase:
```html
<canvas style="aspect-ratio: 1; height: stretch; background: cyan"
width="200" height="100"></canvas>
```
To compute the intrinsic inline sizes we were treating `height: stretch`
as the natural height (100px) and then transferring that to the inline
axis through the preferred aspect ratio. So the element was 100px wide.
However, an indefinite `stretch` should be treated as an automatic size,
which wouldn't be transferred to the inline axis.
The fix actually makes the code slightly simpler.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Add a new struct `LayoutBoxBase`, that will be used throughout the box
tree. The idea of this struct is that we have a place to consistently
store common layout information (style and node information) and also to
cache layout results such as content sizes (inline and maybe later box
sizes) and eventually layout results.
In addition to the addition of this struct,
`IndependentFormattingContext` is flattened slightly so that it directly
holds the contents of both replaced and non-replaced elements.
This is only added to independent formatting contexts, but will later be
added to all block containers as well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* Refactor computation of preferred aspect ratios
Computing min/max-content sizes required a ContainingBlock in order to
resolve the padding and border when determining the preferred aspect
ratio. However, all callers already knew the padding and border, so they
can compute the ratio themselves, and pass it directly instead of
the ContainingBlock.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* Put preferred aspect ratio into ConstraintSpace
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
We were using the preferred aspect ratio provided by the `aspect-ratio`
property instead of the natural aspect ratio. However, the preferred
aspect ratio should only be used to size the replaced element. To paint
the replaced contents into that element we need the natural ratio.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
The min-content and max-content sizes on the block axis depend on the
inline size. But when computing the SizeConstraint corresponding to the
inline axis, we were resolving the preferred inline size ignoring
intrinsic keywords. Now we will only ignore `auto`.
Also, this patch refactors the logic to compute the min-content and
max-content block sizes after fully resolving the inline size.
This avoids having to resolve the inline sizing properties twice.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
In most cases we already had a LazyCell anyways, since we could need the
value for multiple properties. Instead of passing a callback that forces
the evaluation of the LazyCell, it's simpler to just pass the LazyCell
directly.
Also, this way we no longer need mutable references.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
To compute the min-content and max-content inline sizes of a replaced
element, we were only using the aspect ratio to transfer definite block
sizes resulting from clamping the preferred block size between the min
and max block sizes.
However, if the preferred block size is indefinite, then we weren't
transfering the min and max through the aspect ratio.
This patch adds a `SizeConstraint` enum that can represent these cases,
and a `ConstraintSpace` struct analogous to `IndefiniteContainingBlock`
but with no inline size, and a `SizeConstraint` block size.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
We don't need to floor the preferred box sizes to be at least zero,
since `used_size_as_if_inline_element_from_content_box_sizes()` will
take care of applying min and max constraints, and the min has been
floored to be at least zero.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
The logic varied quite a bit depending on the case, now it's unified.
This also fixes the following case where the iframe was 150px tall
instead of 50px:
```html
<iframe style="min-width: 400px; max-height: 50px"></iframe>
```
This also modifies video-intrinsic-width-height.html to expect the new
behavior that we share with Blink and WebKit. In fact WebKit already
modified this test but forgot to export the change upstream. Firefox is
different but it was already failing anyways.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
A `<video>` element with no source won't have a natural aspect ratio,
but `aspect-ratio: auto` should still fall back to a ratio of 300/150.
`used_size_as_if_inline_element_from_content_box_sizes()` was already
handling this, but other consumers of `preferred_aspect_ratio()` were
wrong. In particular, this resulted in a 0px wide inline-block:
```html
<div style="display: inline-block; border: solid">
<video style="height: 100px; background: cyan"></video>
</div>
```
So this patch moves the fallback into `preferred_aspect_ratio()`.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
We were following CSS2, which didn't handle `aspect-ratio`.
This patch simplifies the logic and handles it correctly.
Unfortunately this makes 2 tests fail, but I'm pretty sure they aren't
spec-compliant. I'm leaving them as-is for now since they are part of
interop-2021, and Gecko, Blink and WebKit pass them (because of some
non-interoperable incorrect behaviors).
I'm adding a new test that is fully passed by Servo and WebKit.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* feat: patch for video layout sizes
added rebase from main 2024/10/05
Co-authored-by: Josh Matthews <josh@joshmatthews.net>
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* feat: take width and height parameters if provided
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* chore: tidy the code and update test expectations
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* feat: handle removing poster
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* chore: update test expectations and remove debug code
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* fix: issues after rebasing to main
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* feat: pass src remove test and tidy
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* chore: clippy fixes
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* chore: update passing test expectations
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* fix object-position-svg test
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* fix unintentional override of video size and resize events
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* change how resize events are sent to better match the spec
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* simplify poster mutation handling
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: eri <eri@inventati.org>
* improved handling of intrinsic sizes
- differentiate between natural size and css size
- presentational attributes
- fallback ratio for video element
- handle more cases where the src/poster are added/removed
- aspect ratio hints
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* update test expectations
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* fix cleaning current frame
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* update test expectations
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: eri <eri@inventati.org>
* More code review suggestions
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
* Prevent aspect-ratio:auto from pulling the ratio from the default object size
As resolved in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7524#issuecomment-1204462924
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: eri <epazos@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: eri <eri@inventati.org>
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Josh Matthews <josh@joshmatthews.net>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Also, it was assuming that the aspect ratio would work with the content
box dimensions, but that isn't the case for `aspect-ratio: <ratio>` with
`box-sizing: border-box`.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This is the second flexbox caching change. It seeks to detect when a
relayout can be avoided in the case of a stretching flex item. This
heuristic can be combined, because currently we still do relayout
sometimes when we do not need to.
For instance currently we always relayout when a flex child is itself a
column flex. This only needs to happen when the grandchildren themselves
grow or shrink. That optimization is perhaps a lower priority as
`flex-grow: 0 / flex-shrink: 1` is the default behavior for flex.
Since this change means we more consistenly zero out the percentage part
of `calc` expressions when they have circular dependencies, this causes one
test to start failing (`/css/css-values/calc-min-height-block-1.html`).
This is related to w3c/csswg-drafts#10969, which is pending on further
discussion in the working group.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
The result of `inline_content_sizes()` may depend on the block size of
the containing block, so we were always recomputing in case we got
a different block size.
However, if no content has a vertical percentage or stretches vertically,
then we don't need to recompute: the result will be the same anyways.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
This will allow callers to start obeying `min-content`, `max-content`,
`fit-content` and `stretch` in follow-up patches.
The old functionality is kept as deprecated methods that we should
eventually remove.
This patch has very little impact on the existing behavior, just some
very minimal implementation of the keywords for css tables.
This also overhauls fixed-layout-2.html since:
- It had code that wasn't doing anything
- It had wrong expecations in prose
- The logic seemed broken in general
- All browsers were failing one testcase
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This also makes a couple small improvements:
- Rename `IntrinsicSizes` to `NaturalSizes` which reflects more
modern spec language.
- Move the conversion of Stylo's `ImageRendering` to WebRender's
version to a `ToWebRender` trait implementation.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This change removes the `effective_writing_mode` concept and tries to
properly implement right-to-left layout support for all non-inline
writing modes. In general, what needs to happen is that rectangles
need to be converted to physical rectangles using the containing block.
A right-to-left rectangle's inline start is on the right physical side
of the containing block. Likewise a positive inline offset in
right-to-left text is a negative physical one.
The implementation here is pretty good for most layout modes, but floats
are still a bit in process. Currently, floats are processed in the
logical layout of the block container, but there still might be issues
with float interaction with mixed RTL and LTR.
While this does move us closer to supporting vertical writing modes,
this is still unsupported.
New failures:
- Vertical writing mode not supported:
- `/css/CSS2/floats/floats-placement-vertical-001b.xht`
- `/css/CSS2/floats/floats-placement-vertical-001c.xht`
- Absolutes inlines should avoid floats (#33323)
- `/css/css-position/position-absolute-dynamic-static-position-floats-004.html`
- No support for grid
- `/css/css-align/self-alignment/self-align-safe-unsafe-grid-003.html`
- `/css/css-position/static-position/inline-level-absolute-in-block-level-context-009.html`
- `/css/css-position/static-position/inline-level-absolute-in-block-level-context-010.html`
- Cannot reproduce these locally on any platform. Very mysterious:
- `/css/css-tables/row-group-margin-border-padding.html`
- `/css/css-tables/row-margin-border-padding.html`
- Exposes bugs we have related to hanging whitespace in preserved
whitespace inlines:
- `/css/css-text/white-space/trailing-space-and-text-alignment-rtl-003.html`
- `/css/css-text/white-space/white-space-pre-wrap-trailing-spaces-023.html`
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Rakhi Sharma <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
* Use app unit in `ComputedValuesExt`
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: atbrakhi <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
* Some miscellaneous fixes
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* remove redundant defination of `containing_block_inline_size`
Signed-off-by: atbrakhi <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: atbrakhi <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
In particular, this takes into account that flex items may be stretched,
and if they have an aspect ratio, we ma6y need to convert the stretched
size through the ratio.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
When computing the automatic minimum size, flex layout was using the
natural aspect ratio, ignoring the `aspect-ratio` property.
`ReplacedContent::inline_size_over_block_size_intrinsic_ratio()` is now
made private to avoid more accidental uses.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
We were only handling the aspect ratio of a replaced element when
computing its min/max-content contribution, but not when computing
the min/max-content size. Now both cases will take it into account.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
When computing the min-content or max-content size of an element we
need to ignore `inline-size`, `min-inline-size` and `max-inline-size`.
However, we should take the block-axis sizing properties into account.
That's because the contents could have percentages depending on them,
which can then affect their inline size via an aspect ratio.
Therefore, this patch adds `IndefiniteContainingBlock`, which is similar
to `ContainingBlock`, but it allows an indefinite inline-size. This
struct is then passed arround during intrinsic sizing.
More refinement will be needed in follow-up patches in order to fully
address the problem.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
We want to selectively enable right-to-left writing modes per layout
context. This change makes that possible by allowing access to
`writing-mode` though an interface that always returns the default
horizontal top-to-bottom (implicitly left-to-right) writing mode.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Rakhi Sharma <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
This converts all geometry in the FragmentTree into physical geometry,
doing conversions ahead of time instead of when traversing the fragment
tree. This is necessary to properly implement BiDi in Servo as we need
to know what side borders are on in mixed RTL and LTR contexts.
In addition, fragments are laid out in a particular context and only
that context knows its writing mode. There were issues where were using
one writing mode to lay out and another to convert to phyisical
coordinates. This isn't an issue now since we only use the default
writing mode, but starts to be an issue with BiDi text.
Closes#25564.
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
* Add WPT tests for box-sizing with aspect-ratio
Signed-off-by: valadaptive <valadaptive@protonmail.com>
* Implement `aspect-ratio` for replaced elements
There are two regressions because we don't implement `object-fit`, and
one because we don't properly represent non-available <img>s with `alt`
attributes.
Signed-off-by: valadaptive <valadaptive@protonmail.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: valadaptive <valadaptive@protonmail.com>
If a (min/max)-(height/width) property is set, we still need to respect
the intrinsic ratio of the element if it exists. The previous code was
simply clamping the element size after doing the sizing calculations
once, but this leads to an incorrect aspect ratio.
Signed-off-by: valadaptive <valadaptive@protonmail.com>
* Move WebRender related types to `webrender_traits`
This refactor moves several WebRender related types
from `compositing_traits`, `script_traits` and `net_traits`
crates to the `webrender_traits` crate.
This change also moves the `Image` type and associated
function out of `net_traits` and into the `pixels` crate.
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
* Move `script_traits::WebrenderIpcSender` to `webrender_traits::WebRenderScriptApi`
---------
Signed-off-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
