Write animated values into the `ComputedValues` structures when animations complete or are interrupted.
This adds a new pair of reader-writer locks. I measured the performance
of style recalculation on Wikipedia and the overhead of the locks was
not measurable.
Closes#7816.
cc @paulrouget
r? @glennw
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/8670)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
animations complete or are interrupted.
This adds a new pair of reader-writer locks. I measured the performance
of style recalculation on Wikipedia and the overhead of the locks was
not measurable.
Closes#7816.
Use the PrintTree utility to improve the readability of flow tree
dumps. Blocks and fragments are now split over two dump levels, because
otherwise they are impenetrable. Also start printing the restyle damage of
fragments.
Clean up restyle damage after it no longer applies
BUBBLE_ISIZES and REPAINT can become "stuck" on in the default Servo
configuration once they are activated. This is solved by removing these
damage bits after they no longer apply. There isn't a good way to test
this, other than noting that it doesn't break any existing CSS tests.
This will become more important in the future as the REPAINT bit is used
to implement display list patching.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/8628)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
BUBBLE_ISIZES and REPAINT can become "stuck" on in the default Servo
configuration once they are activated. This is solved by removing these
damage bits after they no longer apply. There isn't a good way to test
this, other than noting that it doesn't break any existing CSS tests.
This will become more important in the future as the REPAINT bit is used
to implement display list patching.
This means we only deal with TrustedNodeAddress in LayoutTask::handle_reflow,
which is where the safety of this usage is guaranteed (by the ScriptReflow
destructor).
Remove the unused arguments to hit_test and mouse_over.
I don't think this code is called when there is no document element, but I
added assertions to make sure we notice in case I was wrong.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/8548)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
I don't believe there is a case where it would make sense to drop the
ScriptReflow struct without joining the script thread. This approach should
be somewhat more robust, and avoids the code smell of a RAII guard in an
otherwise unused variable.
Properly make stacking contexts for inlines
Instead of making a stacking context out of inline fragments parent
flow, make the inline fragment itself the stacking context. This fixes
positioning and rendering of these sort of fragments and prevents
over-layerization.
Fixes#7424.
Fixes#5812.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/8376)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Instead of making a stacking context out of inline fragments parent
flow, make the inline fragment itself the stacking context. This fixes
positioning and rendering of these sort of fragments and prevents
over-layerization.
Fixes#7424.
Fixes#5812.