Sync WPT with upstream (11-10-2019)
Automated downstream sync of changes from upstream as of 11-10-2019.
[no-wpt-sync]
r? @servo-wpt-sync
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24424)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Dom response check opaque filter
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Added setters for url_list, status, and body in `Response`. Response members are set for [Network Error](https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-network-error), [Opaque](https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-filtered-response-opaque) and [Opaque-redirect](https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-filtered-response-opaque-redirect) responses.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#24372 (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24379)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Create a zip of all UWP packaging artifacts.
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#24282
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24417)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Add secure connection start
Implementing `secure_connection_start` as well as we can, this is related to #21268
We are setting the value as well as we can since we don't have a way to know if we are currently using a secure transport or where the handshake before the connection is done as the spec says on the step 15 [https://w3c.github.io/resource-timing/#sec-process](https://w3c.github.io/resource-timing/#sec-process)
Regarding the Timing Allow Check, that's being done on another PR by another person which will take care of setting the rest of the values on `PerformaceResourceTiming` to Zero and prevent them to set them any other way.
I'm currently setting the `secure_connection_time` using `precise_time_ms()` as the `connection_start` and `connection_end` are set that way... but other attributes inside `PerformanceResourceTiming` are set using `precise_time
Another thing, the issue talks about setting `redirect_start` but I'm not really sure if it's related, if so I can look up into that too... I might have just read and thought it was all about secure connection start.
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix#21268
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23990)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
don't send progress event for empty blob
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#24289 (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24312)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
webgl: Clear the drawing buffer when preserveDrawingBuffer is false.
This adds an explicit clear operation to a webgl canvas when the preserveDrawingBuffer attribute is false when creating the context. Because we're not using double buffering this may end up making some demos worse (ie. a clear operation at a random time while drawing a frame), but this problem is expected to go away when #24256 is fixed and we move to a multi-buffered frame setup. This change is important at this time because so many babylon.js demos rely on the engine clearing the frame, per the specification.
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#21132
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24386)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Update iovec
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24411)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Remove obsolete logic for LRUCache size
The LRUCache implementation has been replaced, and no longer requires a backing store larger than its capacity.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24339)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Sync WPT with upstream (09-10-2019)
Automated downstream sync of changes from upstream as of 09-10-2019.
[no-wpt-sync]
r? @servo-wpt-sync
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24407)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Fetch: ensure consistency between response, done-chan, and cache state.
This ensures that when a cached response is not used because it requires revalidation, the done chan is set back to `None`(since the cache might have set it to `Some` when constructing the response requiring revalidation).
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix#24399 (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24401)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Websocket: use ipc router to handle ws dom-action messages
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Use the ipc router as opposed to spawning a dedicated thread.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24402)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Mostly renaming for clarity, as the gradient parsing code is a bit hairy.
This also changes -webkit- gradients, which is, I think, the right thing to do
(otherwise I need to give up on the type system and sprinkle parse_non_negatives
around, which would be unfortunate).
I filed https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1008112 on
Chromium still accepting negative radii for those, so will wait to submit the
patch for review until they reply there with their intentions.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47141
We always check StyleWillChangeBits_TRANSFORM bit together with a
transform-like property set, so using WillChangeBits::TRANSFORM bit to
represent all transform-like properties is ok.
However, it seems the new test case works well even if we don't have this
patch. I still add it for individual transform properties to make sure
the test coverage is enough anyway.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D47509
