Before this fix, if a TextRun containing an insertion point was split into
multiple ScannedText fragments, text layout would draw an insertion point
inside of each of the fragments. This patch records the insertion point
position at most once per TextRun, and copies it only into the appropriate
ScannedText fragment.
layout: Allow non-absolutely-positioned elements with `overflow: scroll` set to be scrolled.
This makes them establish stacking contexts, which is a CSS 2.1 spec
violation. However, we were already violating the spec here for
absolutely-positioned elements with `overflow: scroll`. It will probably
be easier to fix this spec violation once we either switch entirely to
WebRender or we have multiple layers per stacking context.
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10450)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Issue #10441: Added caching support to mach bootstrap
As suggested on the issue, files are stored as `.part` and moved to the original name when done.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10442)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Added --soft-fail option.
At the moment, wptrunner always runs the WPT tests with `servo --hard-fail`. To test hardening, we need to switch off `--hard-fail`. This PR introduces a `--soft-fail` option to do that.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10420)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
set to be scrolled.
This makes them establish stacking contexts, which is a CSS 2.1 spec
violation. However, we were already violating the spec here for
absolutely-positioned elements with `overflow: scroll`. It will probably
be easier to fix this spec violation once we either switch entirely to
WebRender or we have multiple layers per stacking context.
Closes#2742.
This fixes https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/10260 by pulling in
https://github.com/servo/ipc-channel/pull/61 (fix receive for messages
close to packet size) and https://github.com/servo/ipc-channel/pull/62
(properly handle ENOBUFS); where the latter is not critical per se, as
there was a workaround already -- but that workaround aggrevated the
first bug, resulting in the urgent issue...
This bump requires a tidy override for `uuid`: `ipc-channel` was updated
to `uuid 0.2` in https://github.com/servo/ipc-channel/pull/63 (don't
know why...), while other crates are still with `0.1`. That was blocking
this urgent bug fix; and according to a discussion with @mbrubeck on
IRC, the override should be OK in this case.
Move some CSS properties to match Gecko's representation
Fixes#10403. Animation had an extra transition-delay property, which was also moved to Box. Let me know if I should squash the commits.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10407)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Added Uniform{1iv, 2f, 2fv}
The remaining ones need changes to webrender_traits, so I'll have to open a PR there too.
r? @emilio
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10432)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Snap scrolling to major axis of movement
This is what Safari does, and it leads to much better behavior, in particular wrt overscrolling. It does cause a staircase effect when scrolling diagonally, which again Safari has, too. I don't think that bad, because it should occur very rarely in practice.
Fixes#10341
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="35" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/10387)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
