This allows servo to use the ExternalScrollId API from WebRender fixing
some issues related to duplicate scroll root ids.
Fixes#17176.
Fixes#19287.
Fixes#19648.
Add a --bin flag to the |mach run and rr-record commands
Add a --bin flag to the |mach run and rr-record commands to specify which servo binary to run
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Step 1 for #19505.
This flag allows to specify a downloaded servo binary for the ./mach run and ./mach rr-record commands.
The base issue is mentored by @jdm
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because | I would love to write tests on this, but I'm not really sure I can, since it's on ./mach commands
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19944)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Verify that all values in include.ini represent real directories
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
wpt manifest(include.ini) contains directories as headers. With this test in **test-tidy** we check if they are present in respective wtp test folders.
---
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#19703
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19929)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Cleanup StyleBuilder.
This is in preparation of a cascade optimization for custom properties.
This fixes various fishiness around our StyleBuilder stuff. In particular,
StyleBuilder::for_derived_style (renamed to for_animation) is only used to
compute specified values, and thus doesn't need to know about rules, visited
style, or other things like that.
The flag propagation that was done in StyleAdjuster is now done in StyleBuilder,
since we know beforehand which ones are always inherited, and it simplified the
callers and the StyleAdjuster code. It also fixed some fishiness wrt which flags
were propagated to anon boxes and text.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19935)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This is in preparation of a cascade optimization for custom properties.
This fixes various fishiness around our StyleBuilder stuff. In particular,
StyleBuilder::for_derived_style (renamed to for_animation) is only used to
compute specified values, and thus doesn't need to know about rules, visited
style, or other things like that.
The flag propagation that was done in StyleAdjuster is now done in StyleBuilder,
since we know beforehand which ones are always inherited, and it simplified the
callers and the StyleAdjuster code. It also fixed some fishiness wrt which flags
were propagated to anon boxes and text.
The text-decoration-lines bit is interesting, because the way it was implemented
in #17722 meant that display: contents elements did get HAS_DECORATION_LINES
flags only if its parent also had it, so in practice the Contents check
preserves behavior, but it's only an optimization looking at Gecko's call-sites,
so we can remove it too.
MozReview-Commit-ID: 6BHCyEO2U8c
Supress output from git push in WPT sync.
Pushing to the remote exposes sensitive data in the logs of the job. The old token has been revoked as a consequence.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19920)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
