TextDecoder's Decode now receives a BufferSource as input
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
r? jdm
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#20344 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20413)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
feat(fetch): accept arraybuffer in consume_body
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Related to https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/20346.
I realized I am not sufficiently knowledgeable about codebases and have high confidence this PR is not ready to be accepted. Raising it as PR early to possibly ask some suggestions around codebases.
If this PR seems unrecoverable by code review, please feel freely close and unassign me from issue 🙏
This PR tries to implement #20346, updating `Body` idl and implements corresponding implementation in `body.rs` for `fetch`. Criteria for changes may includes
- does `run_array_buffer_data_algorithm` implementation is legit for allocating arraybuffer? (probably not)
- does `run_array_buffer_data_algorithm` implementation is acceptable for handling error, by naively returning `Error::JSFailed`?
- there are some number of wpt test started to PASS with this PR. Is this legit side effect, or something incorrect by current implementation?
- etcs, vice versa
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#20346 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
- wpt test has changed in PR, need to be reviewed.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20406)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Add constructors for typed arrays in DOMMatrix and DOMMatrixReadOnly
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
- DOMMatrix now have the functions: FromFloat32Array, FromFloat64Array.
- DOMMatrixReadOnly now have the functions: FromFloat32Array, FromFloat64Array, ToFloat32Array, ToFloat64Array.
r? @jdm
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#20349 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20405)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
GamepadButtonList::sync_from_vr should use more iterators #20392
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Used the zip function instead of iterating over both vectors with an indexing variable and using unwrap.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix #20392(github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [x] These changes do not require tests because it says in the issue description no need for tests
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20404)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Sanitize Heap::handle(_mut) functions
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Complementary to https://github.com/servo/rust-mozjs/pull/404.
Removing `Heap::handle_mut` didn't warrant any changes on Servo side, and so the changes here are only to fix compilation with `Heap::handle` being now marked as `unsafe`.
The main idea is that we can't hand out handles to heap values themselves, since they're not guaranteed to be rooted, but it's safe to do when we are - hence why the safe impl on `RootedTraceableBox<Heap<T>>` and why it's safe to use inside structs that hold a Heap and are `#[must_root]`.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [X] These changes do not require tests because the compiler forces correctness here.
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20399)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
getRandomValues uses ArrayBufferView now
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
- Changed the `Crypto.webidl` file to allow getRandomValues to recieve an ArrayBufferView as input
- Removed unnecesary checks from `crypto.rs` and did the necessary changes to match the `webidl` changes.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#20350 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20389)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Profiler for blocked IpcReceiver::recv()
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Implements feature #19223
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#19223 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
WIP.
@jdm - this is the new profiler : "Blocked at IPC Receive"
Should I dig through all the calls to `ipc::channel` and replace them with this profiled `IpcReceiver`?
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/20132)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Those parameters aren't optional in the current spec.
The test element-array-buffer-delete-recreate.html now fails because we don't
actually implement gl.getParameter(gl.CURRENT_PROGRAM).
