Table columns should be layed out according to the 'direction' property of the
table flow, regardless of the 'direction' property of any table-row,
table-rowgroup, etc. flows.
This fixes a number of the `direction-applies-to-*` tests in the CSS2.1 test
suite.
This also simplifies `propagate_column_inline_sizes_to_child` by separating
the code used for table cells from the code for non-cell flows.
r? @pcwalton
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/5997)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Table columns should be layed out according to the 'direction' property of the
table flow, regardless of the 'direction' property of any table-row,
table-rowgroup, etc. flows.
This fixes a number of the `direction-applies-to-*` tests in the CSS2.1 test
suite.
This also simplifies `propagate_column_inline_sizes_to_child` by separating
the code used for table cells from the code for non-cell flows.
r? @pcwalton
computing the intrinsic widths of the associated fragment.
Fixes sites that use spacer gifs for table layout, such as the comments
page on Hacker News.
Improves the Google SERPs.
We mark `html/rendering/replaced-elements/images/space.html` as failing.
This test tested whether `<img hspace>` and inline margins do the same
thing. Since this was trivially the case before (since we implemented
neither) and now is not, this test now fails.
Spec: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-device-adapt/
Currently, the actual viewport is used by the layout task as part of the reflow, and the compositor uses the zoom constraints. I'm not sure if anywhere else currently needs access to the constraints (i.e. there's no CSSOM as far as I can tell).
I did not implement sections 9 (viewport <META>) or 10 (handling 'auto' for 'zoom').
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/5361)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
blocks.
* Stop double-counting border and padding for inline-block fragments.
(Test case: `inline_block_border_intrinsic_size_a.html`.)
* Take clearance into account when determining intrinsic widths of
blocks containing floats.
Improves the Amazon headers.
* Fix queries involving stacking contexts
* The code was double accumulating stacking context origins.
* Handle queries of inline elements.
* The node addresses being compared were incorrect (CharacterData vs. Span)
* Handle ScriptQuery reflows correctly.
* The layout task was skipping the compute absolute positions traversal, so failed before window.onload.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/5913)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
* Fix queries involving stacking contexts
* The code was double accumulating stacking context origins.
* Handle queries of inline elements.
* The node addresses being compared were incorrect (CharacterData vs. Span)
* Handle ScriptQuery reflows correctly.
* The layout task was skipping the compute absolute positions traversal, so failed before window.onload.
A rebuild after touching components/profile/mem.rs now takes 48 seconds (and
only rebuilds `profile` and `servo`) which is much lower than it used to be.
In comparison, a rebuild after touching components/profile_traits/mem.rs takes
294 seconds and rebuilds many more crates.
This change also removes some unnecessary crate dependencies in `net` and
`net_traits`.
NodeTypeId is supposed to reflect the WebIDL inheritance hierarchy.
All of Text/ProcessingInstruction/Comment inherit from CharacterData,
which inherits from Node. There should be a CharacterDataTypeId value
that differentiates between those, instead.
This add some properties to the style system and a new flow type, but the larger issues of dealing with fragmentation in the flow tree is still an open question.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/5480)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
