This is preparation for sharing this code with layout_2020 and
implementing selective off-the-main-thread animations.
We still look for nodes not in the flow tree in the layout thread.
This is a small step toward fixing #19242. The main idea is that the
clock for animations should advance as the event loop ticks. We
accomplish this by moving the clock from layout and naming it the
"animation timeline" which is the spec language. This should fix
flakiness with animations and transitions tests where a reflow could
move animations forward while script was running.
This change also starts to break out transition and animation events
into their own data structure, because it's quite likely that the next
step in fixing #19242 is to no longer send these events through a
channel.
This change corrects synchronization issues with animations, by
reworking the animation processing model to do a quick restyle and
incremental layout when ticking animations.
While this change adds overhead to animation ticks, the idea is that
this will be the fallback when synchronous behavior is required to
fulfill specification requirements. In the optimistic case, many
animations could be updated and applied off-the-main-thread and then
resynchronized when style information is queried by script.
Fixes#13865.
This is triggered when an animation finishes. This is a high priority
because it allows us to start rooting nodes with animations in the
script thread.
This doesn't yet cause a lot of tests to pass because they rely on the
existence of `Document.getAnimations()` and the presence of
`animationstart` and animationiteration` events.
These events are triggered as soon as a transition is added to the list
of running transitions. This will allow better test coverage while
reworking the transitions and animations processing model.
This change adds support for canceling CSS transitions when a property
is no longer transitionable or when an element becomes styled with
display:none. Support for canceling and replacing CSS transitions when
the end value changes is still pending. This change also takes advantage
of updating the constellation message to fix a bug where transition
events could be sent for closed pipelines.
Fixes#15079.
Restructure Blob, structured serialization
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
FIX#24052 and also address the "cloning" half of FIX#23917
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/24123)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Fix loophole in messageport transfer
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix#24600 (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Update timer scheduler to use crossbeam
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
It seems time to update the timer scheduler implementation to use crossbeam constructs.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
Implement pointerDown and pointerUp webdriver actions
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23988)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
