This type is a lot of complexity related to a very specific thing such as the
hover and active quirk.
Instead of that, move `nesting_level` to `MatchingContext`, and simplify all
this computing whether the quirk applies upfront, for each complex selector we
test.
This is less error-prone, and also allows simplifying more stuff in a bit.
This patch makes the MallocSizeOf stuff in Stylo work more like the HeapSizeOf
stuff already in Servo, except better. In particular, it adds deriving support
for MallocSizeOf, which will make it easier to improve coverage.
The patch does the following.
- Combines servo/components/style/stylesheets/memory.rs and the heapsize crate
into a new crate, malloc_size_of.
- Forks the heapsize_derive crate, calling it malloc_size_of, so that
MallocSizeOf can be derived.
- Both the new crates have MIT/Apache licenses, like heapsize, in case they are
incorporated into heapsize in the future.
- Renames the methods within MallocSizeOf and the related traits so they are
more concise.
- Removes MallocSizeOfWithGuard.
- Adds `derive(MallocSizeOf)` to a lot of types, in some cases replacing an
equivalent or almost-equivalent hand-written implementation.
- Adds stuff so that Rc/Arc can be handled properly.
Propagate dirty bits after invalidation if needed.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Follow up for [bug 1388298](https://bugzil.la/1388298).
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #__ (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18271)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
There's the question of whether should we be recursing into the invalidation
code for elements without data... Probably not, but that's a somewhat more
risky change.
Bug: 1391444
Signed-off-by: Emilio Cobos Álvarez <emilio@crisal.io>
This moves us to clear on rebuild, which allows us to remove yet another place
where we track stylist dirtiness.
Bug: 1390255
Reviewed-by: heycam
MozReview-Commit-ID: nihQbUAbh8
Signed-off-by: Emilio Cobos Álvarez <emilio@crisal.io>
In animation-only restyle, we just need to check the element
has animation restyle hints or has recascade self which is a result
of animation-only restyle for ancestors.
has_current_styles() in Servo_ResolveStyle() is intentionally left there,
it will be changed in a subsequent patch.
