style: Split the invalidation processing from the invalidator step.
This is the first step in reusing the invalidation machinery for other stuff,
potentially including QuerySelector / QuerySelectorAll.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18847)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Reduce the blur and spread radius size of a reftest.
In the near future, we'll be changing the blur algorithm in WR.
On native GPUs, this is fine - but on OSMesa, a blur of this
radius and spread is quite slow, and can cause test timeouts
when running with a lot of processes enabled.
Reducing the spread / blur shouldn't affect what this is testing.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18856)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
In the near future, we'll be changing the blur algorithm in WR.
On native GPUs, this is fine - but on OSMesa, a blur of this
radius and spread is quite slow, and can cause test timeouts
when running with a lot of processes enabled.
Reducing the spread / blur shouldn't affect what this is testing.
Random pipeline closure is less likely to kill pending pipelines.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Make it less likely for pending pipelines to be randomly killed. Pending pipelines send more messages to the constellation, so at the moment we're skewing to killing pipelines early in their lifetimes.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#18852
- [X] These changes do not require tests because it's fixing test infrastructure
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/18853)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
* scrollLeft/scrollTop returned values of parent or even document root
Only the scroll of the node itself is returned. Otherwise 0.0.
* Scrolling via script had set viewport.
This resulted in other nodes appearing scrolled.
Now scroll_offsets are updated with correct node id.
These bugs caused other odd behavior like both body and
document.documentElement being scrolled or the view for scrolled
elements jumping.
Remove the assert_readonly test and add one to verify that assigning to
CSSStyleRule.style correctly forwards to CSSStyleRule.style.cssText.
We currently test for whether CSSStyleRule.style is read-only by
trying to assign to it; however, the spec has it as actually:
interface CSSStyleRule : CSSRule {
...
[SameObject, PutForwards=cssText] readonly attribute CSSStyleDeclaration style;
};
See: https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/
The `PutForwards=cssText` means that assigning to CSSStyleRule.style
should actually assign to style.cssText.
