This change contains three semi-related clean ups:
1. the `to_webrender()` and `from_webrender()` functions on Pipeline are
turned into more-idiomatic `From` and `Into` implementations.
2. `combine_id_with_fragment_type` now returns a `u64` as that is what is
expected for all callers and not a `usize`.
3. The `query_scroll_id` query is removed entirely. The
`ExternalScrollId` that this queries is easily generated directly
from the node's opaque id. Querying into layout isn't necessary at
all.
This requires passing through information about whether or not the
element in question is replaced when checking to see if it's
transformable and transitively all functions that make decisions about
containing blocks. A new FragmentFlag is added to help track this -- it
will be set on both the replaced items BoxFragment container as well as
the Fragment for the replaced item itself.
Fixes#31806.
This adds basic support for `getClientRects()` by sharing code with the
implementation of `getBoundingClientRect()`. In addition to sharing
code, it also shares all of the bugs. Primarily, scrolilng positions are
not taken into account when return boundary rectangles.
This brings the version of WebRender used in Servo up-to-date with Gecko
upstream. The big change here is that HiDPI is no longer handled via
WebRender. Instead this happens via a scale applied to the root layer in
the compositor. In addition to this change, various changes are made to
Servo to adapt to the new WebRender API.
Co-authored-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
Put table cell content fragments into a hieararchy of fragments that
include their table row and table row group fragments. This ensures that
things like relative positioning and transforms set on rows and row
groups properly affect cells and cell content.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
The specification gives instructions for how these values should be
propagated. The other big changs here is that they aren't applied to the
`<body>`.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This doesn't really have observable behavior right now, as much as I
tried to trigger some kind of bug. On the other hand, it's just wrong
and is very obvious when you dump the Fragment tree. If you create a
`display: table-cell` that is a child of the `<body>` all parts of the
anonymous table are flagged as if they are the `<body>` element.
In quirks mode, preserved segment breaks should add line height to
lines. This matches the behavior of WebKit and Blink, but not Gecko.
This also handles the special-case of `<br>` elements, which are
implemented with preserved segment breaks via `white-space: pre-line`.
This is an implementation detail though because `<br>` has a special
behavior if the line isn't empty -- it doesn't add any line height in
this case.
This adds support for table rows, columns, rowgroups and colgroups.
There are few additions here:
1. The createion of fragments, which allows script queries and hit
testing to work properly. These fragments are empty as all cells are
still direct descendants of the table fragment.
2. Properly handling size information from tracks and track groups as
well as frustrating rules about reordering rowgroups.
3. Painting a background seemlessly across track groups and groups. This
is a thing that isn't done in legacy layout (nor WebKit)!
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This implements a very naive row height allocation approach. It has just
enough to implement `vertical-align` in table cells. Rowspanned cells
get enough space for their content, with the extra space necessary being
allocated to the last row. There's still a lot missing here, including
proper distribution of row height to rowspanned cells.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
This change starts collecting the starting baseline set for fragments,
which is necessary for some layout modes (flex and tables, namely) as
well as being important for the implementation of `align-items`. In
addition, it converts baseline measurement to use `Au` everywhere.
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* layout: Round getClientRect queries to pixels properly
Instead of just flooring all pixels in getClientRect queries, we should
round the rectangle.
* Fix scrollWidth/scrollHeight too, and tests
* Tests passing
* Test expectation for legacy layout
---------
Co-authored-by: Oriol Brufau <obrufau@igalia.com>
* layout: Implement support for `line-height` and `vertical-align`
This is an initial implementation of proper `line-height` and
`vertical-align` support. While this change includes the bulk of the
work there are still many missing pieces for full support. In particular
some big missing things are:
- Flex containers do not properly compute their baselines. The idea is
to tackle this in a followup change. This causes various flex tests
to start failing because everything used to be top aligned.
- The implementation of the line-height quirks (only active in quirks
mode) are incomplete. While the quirk works in many cases, there are
still some cases where it is handled incorrectly. This requires more
redesign and refinement, better suited for a followup.
- Most of the features are CSS 3 such as precision control of the
baseline and first and last baselines are not implemented. This
change gets us close to CSS 2.x support.
While there are many new test passes with this change some tests are
starting to fail. An accounting of new failures:
Tests failing also in Layout 2013:
- /css/css2/positioning/toogle-abspos-on-relpos-inline-child.html (only passes in Chrome)
- /css/CSS2/fonts/font-applies-to-001.xht (potentially an issue with font size)
Invalid tests:
- /css/CSS2/visudet/inline-block-baseline-003.xht
- /css/CSS2/visudet/inline-block-baseline-004.xht
- These are are failing in all browsers. See https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1222151.
Missing table support:
- /_mozilla/mozilla/table_valign_middle.html
Missing `font-size-adjust` support :
- /css/css-fonts/font-size-adjust-zero-2.html (also failing in 2013)
Incomplete form field support :
- /html/rendering/widgets/the-select-element/option-add-label-quirks.html (label isn't rendered so button isn't the right size in quirks mode due to line height quirk)
Need support for calculating flexbox baseline:
- /css/css-flexbox/fieldset-baseline-alignment.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flex-inline.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-multi-line-horiz-001.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-single-item-001a.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox-baseline-single-item-001b.html
Failing because we don't create anonymous inline boxes for text children of blocks:
- /css/CSS2/linebox/anonymous-inline-inherit-001.html
Passes locally (potentially related to fonts):
- /css/CSS2/css1/c414-flt-fit-004.xht
- /css/css-transforms/transform-input-017.html
- /html/obsolete/requirements-for-implementations/the-marquee-element-0/marquee-min-intrinsic-size.html
- /css/css-fonts/first-available-font-005.html
- /css/css-fonts/first-available-font-006.html
* Some cleanups after live review with @mukilan
Also update results.
This data structure has all of the metrics needed to render a font and
is in `Au`. We'll need more of these metrics for implementing
`vertical-align` and its use doesn't increase the size of the Fragment
tree (as the BoxFragment is still larger). In addition, this will be
helpful when switching layout to `Au`.
* Add initial support for sticky positioning for non-legacy layout
Many tests still fail for a variety of reasons. One of the primary ones
is that CSSOM currently does not return correct values for elements
positioned by sticky nodes. This requires changes to WebRender to work
properly.
* Fix an assertion failure in the legacy layout sticky code
Refactor the scrolling and scrollable area calculation on the window
object, to make it better match the specification. This has some mild
changes to behavior, but in general things work the same as they did
before. This is mainly preparation for properly handling viewport
propagation of the `overflow` property but seems to fix a few issues as
well.
There is one new failure in Layout 2020 regarding `position: sticky`,
but this isn't a big deal because there is no support for `position:
sticky` in Layout 2020 yet.
Co-authored-by: Rakhi Sharma <atbrakhi@igalia.com>
This makes the names of flow relative geometry consistent with what is
used in the style crate and removes them from a module. With this change
it's more obvious what makes these types different from the ones in
`euclid`.
When layout was split into two phases, floats were laid out as direct
children of the inline formatting context. This meant that they were
positioned properly, but not properly made children of their inline
ancestors' stacking contexts. This change maintains the proper
positioning of floats, but positions them relatively to their inline
ancestors.
The big change here is that `text-align` needs to be taken into account
before actually laying out LineItems. This has the added benefit of
setting inline layout for the implementation of `text-align: full`. Now
all line items are laid out at the real final position and we can adjust
the `start_corner` property of float `BoxFragments` when their ancestors
are laid out.
In the first phase, we gather LineItems and then when we have enough to
form a line we turn them into Fragments. This will make it possible to
more simply implement `vertical-align` and `text-align: justify` because
we need to measure the different aspects of the candidate line and then
produce a Fragments.
This is a general refactor of the way that inline layout works, so comes
with some progressions. In addition there are some new failures.
New failures:
Some tests are now failing because only the test or reference is getting
proper line height when it wasn't before. These should be fixed in a
followup change that properly calculate line-height in more cases:
- /_mozilla/css/list_style_position_a.html
- /css/CSS2/floats/float-no-content-beside-001.html
- /css/css-content/pseudo-element-inline-box.html
- /css/css-flexbox/flexbox_flex-none-wrappable-content.html
Some tests are now failing because floats are now placed properly, but
are no longer in their inline box stacking contexts. These will be fixed
by a followup change which properly parents them:
- /css/filter-effects/filtered-inline-applies-to-float.html.ini
- /css/css-color/inline-opacity-float-child.html.ini
One test is failing due to floating point precision errors:
- /css/CSS2/floats-clear/floats-141.xht.ini
Signed-off-by: Martin Robinson <mrobinson@igalia.com>
Co-authored-by: Mukilan Thiyagarajan <mukilan@igalia.com>
Clearance was implemented as a Length, where zero meant no clearance.
However, having a clearance of 0px should be different than having
no clearance, since the former can still prevent margin collapse.
This patch keeps the existing behavior, so it won't be possible to get
a clearance of Some(Length::zero()), but it prepares the terrain for
a follow-up to fix calculate_clearance to return the proper thing.
This is a simple code organization change with no behavior change with
the idea of making Layout 2020 easier to understand by new folks to the
project. The idea is that we will have a cleaner separation between the
different parts of layout ie one directory for the fragment tree and one
(currently multiple) directory for the box tree.
The specification dictates quite quite idiosyncratic return values when
querying insets of positioned elements via getComputedStyle(). These
depend on whether or not the elements size was overconstrained. This
change adds a better implementation of that in preparation for returning
proper values for position: sticky.
During layout it is often useful, for various specification reasons, to
know if an element is the `<body>` element of an `<html>` element root. There
are a couple places where a brittle heuristic is used to detect `<body>`
elements. This information is going to be even more important to
properly handle `<html>` elements that inherit their overflow property from
their `<body>` children.
Implementing this properly requires updating the DOM wrapper interface.
This check does reach up to the parent of thread-safe nodes, but this is
essentially the same kind of operation that `parent_style()` does, so is
ostensibly safe.
This change should not change any behavior and is just a preparation
step for properly handle `<body>` overflow.
