style: Move text-align outside of the mako file.
I will need this refactoring before my next job. I didn't actually fix the FIXME's along the way. My other PR probably will cover these.
---
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19576)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
implement valid week string
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
implement valid week string
part of #19172
r? @KiChjang
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19559)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Move will-change outside of mako
This is a sub-PR of #19015
r? emilio
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#19582
- [x] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19583)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Send IPC receiver for canvas as part of CreateCanvasPaintThread message
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
I am not sure if @jdm want this.
r? @jdm
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix #19483(github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because _____
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19547)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
layout: background-origin attribute for gradients
Fixes the glitches mentioned in #19554.
Now gradient tiles are placed in the whole bounding box.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Either: -->
- [X] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19568)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Turn flow::base and friends into methods
This feels more idiomatic in modern Rust, and replaces code like this:
`flow::base(&**root_flow).restyle_damage`
with this:
`root_flow.base().restyle_damage`.
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes do not require tests because they are refactoring only
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19565)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Add a topLevelDomComplete metric.
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Measure DOM completion without iframes. This is in support of measuring when the main document is loaded, ignoring secondary content, e.g. ads.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#19561
- [X] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19569)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Make layout depend on style/servo feature
This fixes an error when running commands like `./mach check -p layout`.
---
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes do not require tests because they change build metadata only
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19562)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Use background-size, background-position properties to render
CSS gradients.
Some cleanup in display_list_builder.rs related to gradient
calculations.
Adds two wpt tests for tiled gradients.
Note: For now even gradients with background-repeat: no-repeat
are repeated. Sometimes the gradient is not repeated everywhere.
Enable vars-background-shorthand-001.html CSS test.
selectors: Add parsing support for ::slotted().
Without turning it on yet, of course.
The reason why I didn't use the general PseudoElement mechanism is because this
pseudo is a bit of its own thing, and I found easier to make ::selectors know
about it (because you need to jump to the assigned slot) than the other way
around.
Also, we need to support ::slotted(..)::before and such, and supporting multiple
pseudo-elements like that breaks some other invariants around the SelectorMap,
and fixing those would require special-casing slotted a lot more in other parts
of the code.
Let me know if you think otherwise.
I also don't like much the boolean tuple return value, but I plan to do some
cleanup in the area in a bit, so it should go away soon, I'd hope.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19541)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Without turning it on yet, of course.
The reason why I didn't use the general PseudoElement mechanism is because this
pseudo is a bit of its own thing, and I found easier to make ::selectors know
about it (because you need to jump to the assigned slot) than the other way
around.
Also, we need to support ::slotted(..)::before and such, and supporting multiple
pseudo-elements like that breaks some other invariants around the SelectorMap,
and fixing those would require special-casing slotted a lot more in other parts
of the code.
Let me know if you think otherwise.
I also don't like much the boolean tuple return value, but I plan to do some
cleanup in the area in a bit, so it should go away soon, I'd hope.
