Mark some tests as failing on Linux, not just Ubuntu 14.04.
They also fail for me on Archlinux.
(`absolute-replaced-height-007.htm` is disabled anyway, but let’s change it as well for consistency.)
r? @larsbergstrom
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7082)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Fix requestAnimationFrame timestamps in queue
This resolves#7044 which involved callbacks in a queue not receiving the same timestamp despite the specification saying they should. An extra test was added to verify the correct behavior.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7073)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
This resolves#7044 which involved callbacks
in a queue not receiving the same timestamp despite
the specification saying they should. An extra test
was added to verify the correct behavior.
Make the Ahem font available to test-css and test-wpt tests.
Add support for user stylesheets, and provide one to tests with an `@font-face` rule for it.
Fix#6195.
Many previously-failing tests now pass, and a few previously-passing now fail.
Among the latter, `font-family-013.htm` and `fonts-013.htm` are testing that the Ahem font is not used for characters it doesn’t have a glyph for. They were passing because Ahem was not available at all, and now fail because we don’t implement font fallback correctly.
The others also use Ahem, but I don’t understand yet what’s going on exactly.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7013)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Provide a user stylesheet with an `@font-face` rule for it.
Fix#6195.
Many previously-failing tests now pass, and a few previously-passing now fail.
Among the latter, `font-family-013.htm` and `fonts-013.htm` are testing
that the Ahem font is not used for characters it doesn’t have a glyph for.
They were passing because Ahem was not available at all,
and now fail because we don’t implement font fallback correctly.
The others also use Ahem, but I don’t understand yet what’s going on exactly.
This excludes:
* cssparser, as it contains changes that cause test failures;
* tenacious, as it has not yet been updated to the current rustc
(Manishearth/rust-tenacious#6);
* ipc-channel, as it doesn't build on linux upstream.
layout: Make sure anonymous table flows are statically positioned.
The failing `float-applies-to-*` CSS 2.1 tests never really should have
been passing in the first place; they depend on floats inside
fixed-layout tables working properly, which they don't.
Closes#6078.
Closes#6709.
Closes#6858.
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/6977)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
The failing `float-applies-to-*` CSS 2.1 tests never really should have
been passing in the first place; they depend on floats inside
fixed-layout tables working properly, which they don't.
Closes#6078.
Closes#6709.
Closes#6858.
layout: Take inline margins into account when determining the intrinsic sizes of fragments.
Avoids a needless wrapped line in the repository name on GitHub.
r? @mbrubeck
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7011)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Use Box<str> instead of Box<String> for UnscannedTextFragmentInfo
This removes an extraneous layer of indirection, without increasing the size of the `SpecificFragmentInfo` enum (because `Box<str>` is a fat pointer, which is the same size as the `FlowRef` trait object that is already stored in `InlineAbsoluteHypotheticalFragmentInfo`)
r? @pcwalton
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7014)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Fixes#6879 (Improper connections to the devtools server)
Modifies how we behave in the case that something attempts to communicate with the devtools server improperly. This includes...
- Invalid encoding (Non `UTF8`) of the packet length / error parsing / none specified
- JSON encoding error (such as a `Parser::SyntaxError` or a `Parser::IoError`)
Happy to make changes if anyone has an issue with this or feels another way is more idiomatic!
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7010)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Lock stderr while printing the alert() message.
2a7f262b7d was unsufficient for the case where
the interleaved output was actually on stderr rather than stdout, such as
output from the error macro.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
[<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.png" height=40 alt="Review on Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/7027)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
