Now that we have an Element around on cascade, we can stop using the cascade
flags mechanism to pass various element-related state, like "is this element the
root", or "should it use the item-based display fixup".
That fixes handwaviness in the handling of those flags from style reparenting,
and code duplication to handle tricky stuff like :visited.
There are a number of other changes that are worth noticing:
* skip_root_and_item_based_display_fixup is renamed to skip_item_display_fixup:
TElement::is_root() already implies being the document element, which by
definition is not native anonymous and not a pseudo-element.
Thus, you never get fixed-up if your NAC or a pseudo, which is what the code
tried to avoid, so the only fixup with a point is the item one, which is
necessary.
* The pseudo-element probing code was refactored to return early a
Option::<CascadeInputs>::None, which is nicer than what it was doing.
* The visited_links_enabled check has moved to selector-matching time. The rest
of the checks aren't based on whether the element is a link, or are properly
guarded by parent_style.visited_style().is_some() or visited_rules.is_some().
Thus you can transitively infer that no element will end up with a :visited
style, not even from style reparenting.
Anyway, the underlying reason why I want the element in StyleAdjuster is because
we're going to implement an adjustment in there depending on the tag of the
element (converting display: contents to display: none depending on the tag), so
computing that information eagerly, including a hash lookup, wouldn't be nice.
Not super-proud of this one, but it's the easiest way I could think of.
The changeset looks bigger than what it is, because while at it I've rewrapped a
fair amount of functions around to use proper block indentation.
Alternatives are parameterizing Stylist by <E>, which is not fun, or moving the
concrete element from layout_thread to layout, but that implies layout depending
on script, which isn't fun either.
Other alternative is implementing an empty enum and making anon boxes work on
it. It has the advantage of removing the annoying type parameter, but the
disadvantage of instantiating `cascade` twice, which isn't great, and having to
maintain all the boilerplate of a `TElement` implementation that just does
nothing.
Do not leave space below baseline when it is not needed (i.e.there is…
… no text)
This is my first layout fix and a naive approach to fix#18831.
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#18831
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19789)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
style: Move cursor property out of mako
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Sub-PR of #19015
r? emilio
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `__` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach build-geckolib` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix#19775 (github issue number if applicable).
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] These changes do not require tests
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19798)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
It used to be the case that MatchingContext was immutable and thus we didn't
care to have accessors.
This is no longer true, so let's make this code a bit nicer.
Implement Element::has_css_layout_box()
r? emilio
Here's my initial attempt to fix#19430. It seems surprisingly simple so I am wondering whether I have missed something! (Or maybe it just actually is quite simple...)
Some things I am unsure about:
1. The spec seems vague about what a [CSS layout box](https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#css-layout-box) actually is. Indeed it says: "The terms CSS layout box and SVG layout box are not currently defined by CSS or SVG."
2. One thing the spec *does* say explicitly is "For the purpose of the requirements in this specification, elements that have a computed value of the display property that is table-column or table-column-group must be considered to have an associated CSS layout box (the column or column group, respectively)." I am unclear about the relevance of this, since [overflow does not apply](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-overflow-3/#overflow-properties) to an [internal table element](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/#layout-specific-display). Therefore I haven't done anything about this explicitly, but maybe I'm missing some nuance.
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19803)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Remove gecko-media dependency
The effort to import Gecko's media stack into Servo has been canceled, so I am removing the bits of code from gecko-media that we added to Servo.
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/19806)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
