Update README.md to point to latest bugfix of Python 2 on Windows
Link to latest bugfix release on Windows.
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ X] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23487)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Add value sanitization for input[type=email]
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Add value sanitization for input[type=email] as per the [HTML specification](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/input.html#e-mail-state-(type=email)).
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [x] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [x] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [x] These changes fix part of #21810 (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [x] There are tests for these changes
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23472)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Update test expectations
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
Some of these tests are passing as of #23236. Were these supposed to be removed?
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [ ] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [ ] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [ ] These changes fix #___ (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23480)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Disable video if audio element
And register frame renderer only if video element
Requires the merge of https://github.com/servo/media/pull/257
<!-- Please describe your changes on the following line: -->
---
<!-- Thank you for contributing to Servo! Please replace each `[ ]` by `[X]` when the step is complete, and replace `___` with appropriate data: -->
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
- [X] These changes fix#23336 (GitHub issue number if applicable)
<!-- Either: -->
- [ ] There are tests for these changes OR
- [ ] These changes do not require tests because ___
<!-- Also, please make sure that "Allow edits from maintainers" checkbox is checked, so that we can help you if you get stuck somewhere along the way.-->
<!-- Pull requests that do not address these steps are welcome, but they will require additional verification as part of the review process. -->
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23350)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Allow simultaneous playback of audio and video for getUserMedia
- [X] `./mach build -d` does not report any errors
- [X] `./mach test-tidy` does not report any errors
<!-- Reviewable:start -->
---
This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/servo/servo/23476)
<!-- Reviewable:end -->
Handle "Multiple" attribute for email value sanitization
Fix code formatting
Tests for email value sanitization should pass
Make failing wpt tests pass
Change new_value => sanitized
- Follow Gtk and get theme button text color directly from "button" CSS node instead of "button label"
- Provide new -moz-gtk-buttonactivetext color for active/pressed button text color
- Replace ButtonText color with -moz-gtk-buttonactivetext when it's appropriate
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D30566
This includes style system and layout update. I add 3 extra reftests
because the original tests use ray() function as the offset-path, but we
don't support it. It'd be better to add tests using a different type of
offset-path.
The spec issue about the serialization:
https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/340
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32212
D29542 fixed the bogus checks that was making nested pseudo-elements match
author rules. This adds tests and ends up being just a cleanup, though as it
turns out we it also fixes an issue with ::slotted() matched from
Element.matches.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D27529
This makes *|*::marker do the intended thing in UA sheets, so I think it's
better, and it's a bit less special-casey.
We may want to re-introduce the changes for pseudo-elements at some point,
depending on the WG decision, but this patch makes each_non_document_style_data
consistent with the rule collector.
The changes of each_non_document_style_data on their own should fix some bugs,
but it doesn't because:
* This is only hit for pseudos that allow user-action-state pseudo-classes.
* The containing shadow check worked for them anyway.
* We don't allow any pseudo after ::slotted() or that isn't tree-abiding per
the CSS specs (we should maybe enable one of the moz-range stuff to be
tree-abiding).
So ::placeholder is the only one that right now fits the bill to trigger the
bugs this would fix, but it doesn't since I couldn't make ::placeholder match
:hover / :active / :focus anyhow (inside or outside a shadow tree).
I've left the ProbeMarkerPseudoStyle changes for now since they are technically
a bit more consistent than what was there before, but we could revert those if
they cause trouble, we could rely on the UA rule matching, but we would need to
change that if we allow the ::foo::before and such to match.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D29542
It was introduced in bug 1352096 to reduce complexity with Stylo (apparently).
Right now it doesn't look like it reduces any complexity, and it's a bit
annoying with some of the patches that I'm writing at the moment.
So unless there's any objection I think it should go away.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D31708
This will save us some time from figuring out what's the best thing to do in
bug 1552587, so that other patches I have in flight (mainly bug 1552708) can
land, since we cannot add a single byte to nsStyleDisplay right now otherwise.
The code removed here is well isolated and not that complicated, so it seems to
me that should be easy to bring back should we have an emergency (and I commit
to doing that while preserving the nsStyleDisplay size limit if we need to :)).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D32026
