We don't have lossy currentcolor in the style system anymore, except for a
single property -moz-font-smoothing-background-color.
I could've converted it into a proper StyleColor and thread down all the
necessary information to the font metrics code.
But it doesn't really seem worth it given it's not exposed to the web, so I just
did the simplest thing, which is making currentcolor compute to transparent to
that specific property.
This patch also removes the stores_complex_colors_lossily code and related,
since now we always can cache computed colors.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D26187
To be more similar between Rust and C++. This introduces GenericFontFamily and
exposes that plus FontFamilyNameSyntax to C++, using that where appropriate
instead of plain uint8_t as we were doing.
As a follow-up, as discussed on IRC with Jonathan, we can remove the -moz-fixed
family, and turn it just into an alias of Monospace.
The only non-trivial change is the MatchType changes, but they're ok I think.
The code already assumed at most one CSS generic, and the struct still takes 8
bits. I've verified that the relevant tests are passing (though try is closed).
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D24272
UA style sheets only ever specify a single generic font family in font-family
properties, so we pre-create a unique, static SharedFontList for each generic
and change the representation of FontFamilyList to be able to refer to them
by their generic ID. This avoids having to share refcounted SharedFontList
objects across processes.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D17183
It's not very easy to understand on its current state, and it causes subtle bugs
like bug 1533654.
It could be simpler if we centralized where the interactions between properties
are handled. This patch does this.
This patch also changes how MathML script sizes are tracked when scriptlevel
changes and they have relative fonts in between.
With this patch, any explicitly specified font-size is treated the same (being a
scriptlevel boundary), regardless of whether it's either an absolute size, a
relative size, or a wide keyword.
Relative lengths always resolve relative to the constrained size, which allows
us to avoid the double font-size computation, and not give up on sanity with
keyword font-sizes.
I think given no other browser supports scriptlevel it seems like the right
trade-off.
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D23070
